We present this to you without comment. Arizona's Sheriff Joe claims to have detected that the electronic copy of Obama's long-form birth certificate is "undoubtedly fraudulent."
The evidence takes the form of testimony from a 95-year-old former Hawaii state worker "who signed the president's birth certificate." She revealed to Arpaio's posse that the coding numbers on the scanned birth certificate aren't correctly filled out.
Arpaio's suspicions were further aroused by the fact that Hawaii Assistant Attorney General Jill Nagamine refused to cooperate with the investigation.
The Arizona Democratic Party responded that Arpaio's investigation "is intended to draw attention away from problems within his own agency, such as hundreds of sex-crimes cases that the sheriff's office failed to adequately investigate over a three-year period."
This was a WND story from the start and has remained a WND/Donald Trump story. It never made sense that he was born in Kenya. No offense to Kenya, but what mother would want to have their child in Kenya when she can go home to her parents in Hawaii.
So what do I think of this story now? Who the freak knows? Rumors are floating that Frank Marshall Davis is his real biological father. I don't care who his biological father was.
I would however, like to take a look at his college transcripts. I'm not even concerned about his grades. I want to know his "course selection." I want to see how many marxist history and theory classes he took. I want to see how many courses he took that end in "studies". I want to see which sociology classes he took. Conversely I'm also curious if President Obama has ever set foot in an economics class.
I would hope his course selection was diverse and included everything you mentioned. Since when are Americans afraid of education? We used to pride ourselves on it and we used to demand our leaders be well educated. Now we just seem to want simpletons who have business degrees.
And I'd like to see how he financed those degrees. There are all kinds of rumors out there, but nothing substantial. Even his campaign team from '08 wouldn't elaborate -- they actually quoted from his book.
A woman engaged in an interracial relationship who's interested in seeing the homeland of her lover. Of course it's a fake, and I have asked this question before. WHY doesn't he just request a hard copy from the hospital? Is it because they'll lie for him (totally legal) but draw the line at providing false documentation (totally illegal)?
We're sorry, "Toby"...if that IS your real name...but your opinion does not mesh well with those inclined to support the rise of Great Leader---um, I mean our great leader, so you are BANISHED, dude! You are SOOOOO SUSPENDED, man! Check it out...we just tap a little button here, and VIOLA! The threat has been dismantled, and those guys with the colorful "O"s on their shirts come over and pat us on our backs. Good-bye, and don't let the death-panels and dreams hit you in the bum on the way out.
I hope GOP digs into this and figures this out once and for all. I would like to c his education records too. I'm wondering if all this birth certificate crap isn't just him cheating the system years ago to get into college easier, never thinking he would b running for president one day
They say that if someone believes their delusions enough, the delusions become their reality. Or to put it more simply: if one truly believes their own lies, their lies become truth to them.
Arpaio exists for the same reason that Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, etc (and yes, Maddow, Matthews, etc. Forgive me, I don't know many MSNBC hosts) exist: Ratings. Pure and simple. Ratings = money and influence, and therefore power. And since publicity creates, boosts and influences ratings, Arpaio is merely a ratings whore.
To quote Sam Waterston in 'The Newsroom': "News organizations influence the national conversation." And they do this even more effectively when they have pundits, who aren't technically pundits, feed them talking points, B-roll and quotes (though in FOX and MSNBCs cases, more like 'excerpts.').
I think you missed the whole point...I stated that he's around for the same reasons as the aforementioned talking heads, but that doesn't mean he's around for TV specifically.
As for birtherism, yes, I've looked at both sides of the argument. I've watched both FOX and MSNBC's views, along with Bill Maher's, CNN's, even a small clip on the BBC and CBC. I've weighed both arguments, heard conflicting and opposing views, and I've made my decision.
Also, whether or not I have a delusion is irrelevant. Hypocrisy does not mean fallacy.
what i'd like to know is why some hinkyh little sheriff from some hinky little county in a nasty assed state filled with nothing but sand, cactus and sex rocks is doing 'investigating' the president of the united states. he can't even run his own little sheriffs dept. correctly, or treat the prisoners for whom he is responsible with common decency.
I will have to see difinitive proof before I believe he was not born in Hawaii. But, his college records are of real interest. It would be interesting to see how an apparent low-performing student in a small college got so much opportunity at Harvard. And, above all, who helped him do so...and, what his connection to the Middle East was at that time. IMHO, Barack Husssein Obama is the most divisive president ever to sit in the White House and is a proven racist. This is a real low point in our nations's history.
Now the ppl are starting to open their eyes at who's really raping the system. Money here and money there. Find the accounts and confiscate all of it! That's no different than the actions of a drug dealer!
I think it's entirely possible that the birth certificate is a fake even though I believe Obama was almost certainly born in Hawaii.
Ockham's Razor tells us that the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. The simplest explanation for the oddities surrounding Obama's birth certificate is that due to lousy recordkeeping, Hawaii officials lost his real birth certificate a long time ago. Since that's mortally embarrassing for them, and critical for Obama's ability to prove his eligibility to be President, it was in both parties' interest to cover it up. The documents may be falsified, but the information they contain is probably true nonetheless.
Polls show that up 20% of the American public will believe any conspiracy theory. Obvious Joe Arpaio is one of that 20%. The Democrat Party is so stupid that they run an illegal alien for President, the Republican Party is so stupid that they won't challenge his legal status, and the Supreme Court is so oblivious that they will not hear the case. But hay, Joe Arpaio is the obvious genius of our time. My only conclusion is that the birthers are conspiracy theory victims and just find it more digestible than calling him the N word.
He can't be charged with a crime without evidence and the lack of a hard copy birth certificate is not evidence of a crime. Why don't you learn something about the law before questioning those who work within the system?
Obviously Toby is part of the 20%. It must be wonderful knowing your smarter the the vast majority. Was Einstein your grand father? After all he said "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/Einstei...
Has anyone ever asked if the sherrif's actions have ever been motivated by his racial view points. Frankly it appears he is scraping the bottom of the barrel looking for any excuse he can to discredit this president. By the way, I am white.
"What do I think", you ask? Allow me to enlighten you: I think that that the selection of topics provided here today were published with the intent of enticing certain "right-leaning" individuals to go a bit overboard with their comments, if you will. I've seen quite a few accounts "suspended" today, folks...maybe they've been told that they need to clear out some of the undesirables before they can truly become a cornerstone in the campaign of Great Leader---er, I mean our great leader...
There are days when the stories are more favorable to the right to get the left fired up...the difference in my opinion is when the right get fired up their hatred of obama, and everything those liberals do takes over and they get nasty quick, the left gets fired up too but doesn't quite have the same hateful tones.