pShould pharmaceutical companies be banned from giving gifts to doctors?

Results

84 %

Yes, they should

16 %

No, they shouldn't

@Jul '12 V 352 votes c 111 comments

Detailed Results Next Debate Vote Now

Activity Stmts Popular

352 Votes

u

Mon
smbiz voted

v Yes, they should
Mon
Jen13411 endorsed Keyjo

v Yes, they should
Sun
ladywaterwood voted

v Yes, they should
Sun
Greggmcneill endorsed Keyjo

v Yes, they should
u

Jun 16
ematzke voted

v Yes, they should
Jun 15
runawayfrom voted

v Yes, they should
Jun 15
Nonya voted

v Yes, they should
Jun 14
Fitz endorsed Thunderchicken

v Yes, they should
u

Jun 14
Alphacent voted

v Yes, they should
u

Jun 14
Mr_D_ElPaso voted

v Yes, they should
Jun 12
usmom3 voted

v Yes, they should
u

Jun 10
Whiskey endorsed ir0nw0lfe

v Yes, they should
u

Jun 10
aladinsane endorsed Keyjo

v Yes, they should
Jun 9
griz64blue voted

v Yes, they should
u

Jun 8
hancel voted

v Yes, they should
Jun 7
JenniferLoni voted

v Yes, they should
Jun 7

catiz

v Yes, they should

We're too drugged by companies and doctors who profit at our expense.

Post
u

Jun 6
USN-22 voted

v No, they shouldn't
Jun 6
stevesampson voted

v No, they shouldn't
Jun 6
AnnieMc endorsed Keyjo

v Yes, they should
Jun 5

mikev9359

v Yes, they should

DEFINITELY! This sways doctors to prescribe one brand over another and may even cause a doctor to prescribe a medication that may not be needed.

Post
Jun 4

easttnmugshots

v Yes, they should

One look at easttnmugshots.com or easternkentuckymugshots.com will show you the sheer number of prescription drug related arrests. The doctors are pushed to prescribe these drugs which in turn works its way into the social ills that many communities and family's are facing. Start at the top of the chain and lots of problems at the end could be avoided.

Post
u

Jun 4

bat62

v Yes, they should

If by "gifts" you mean money, trips, etc., then yes. If "gifts" means drugs, then no. Many, many patients receive the benefit of these drugs. If their doctor is good and honest, he gives the free drugs to his patients to help them with drug expenses, or to just try the drug before the patient has to spend money on something he/she can't tolerate. That is supposed to be what these free drugs are used for and not for hoarding for exclusive use of the doctor, his family and work force.

Post
u

Jun 4
Hireman voted

v Yes, they should
u

Jun 4
Linebacker66 voted

v Yes, they should
Jun 3
cr8z4amerika voted

v Yes, they should
Jun 3
dethkat666 endorsed kosmik

v Yes, they should
Jun 3

Canoochee

v No, they shouldn't

Post
Jun 3
LGRepublican endorsed Pookie

v No, they shouldn't
u

Jun 2
Knoll37 voted

v Yes, they should
Jun 2

Mark_Hinkle

v No, they shouldn't

Haven't we learned anything from both alcohol and drug prohibitions? Bands don't work. I've received free samples of medicines given to doctors. Those who would ban this practice are trying to increase my cost of drugs. Why?

Post
Jun 1
rtoberl voted

v Yes, they should
Jun 1
MadAmerican voted

v Yes, they should
Jun 1
H311RA151N voted

v Yes, they should
May 31

busseja

v No, they shouldn't

who would ban them? Don't we have too much government already?

Post
u

May 30
Texasbuzz voted

v Yes, they should
May 29

InquisitiveMe

v Yes, they should

I've seen firsthand (as an RN) how this works, including being prescribed certain new antibiotics because the physician was trying to earn "points" with the pharmaceutical company. In one case, the antibiotic came on to the market with mixed results and ended up being withdrawn because it was toxic to the liver in some people (I was one of them; I recovered). By the same token, several young physicians have pointed out how much money is spent on meaningless promotional "window-dressing" ads for pharmaceuticals that are placed in media targeted toward physicians. The whole system is rotten.

Post
May 28
Raisinbran96 voted

v Yes, they should
May 28
Laz voted

v Yes, they should
u

May 27

tomincali

v Yes, they should

and all in office should be charged with taking bribes when taking money from any outside the country. yet we have a president that the drug cartel supports,sent him money and when caught sent it back,wink wink. says it all about the pres,when drug dealers support you you know you are dirty.

Post
u

May 26
Rydad voted

v Yes, they should
May 26
Koma voted

v Yes, they should
May 24
falco_alba voted

v Yes, they should
May 24

Nurse8493

v Yes, they should

Pharmaceutical gifts can be bribes. It creates a pandemic of corruption in our health care system.

Post
u

May 24
johndziedzic voted

v Yes, they should
u

May 23
CivilWarSam endorsed JesseWeger

v No, they shouldn't
u

May 23
DaQuietOne endorsed Thunderchicken

v Yes, they should
u

May 22
DanielMincin voted

v No, they shouldn't
May 22
frigginhell voted

v Yes, they should
May 21
iidank endorsed Thunderchicken

v Yes, they should

Jun 7

catiz

v Yes, they should

We're too drugged by companies and doctors who profit at our expense.

Post
Jun 5

mikev9359

v Yes, they should

DEFINITELY! This sways doctors to prescribe one brand over another and may even cause a doctor to prescribe a medication that may not be needed.

Post
Jun 4

easttnmugshots

v Yes, they should

One look at easttnmugshots.com or easternkentuckymugshots.com will show you the sheer number of prescription drug related arrests. The doctors are pushed to prescribe these drugs which in turn works its way into the social ills that many communities and family's are facing. Start at the top of the chain and lots of problems at the end could be avoided.

Post
u

Jun 4

bat62

v Yes, they should

If by "gifts" you mean money, trips, etc., then yes. If "gifts" means drugs, then no. Many, many patients receive the benefit of these drugs. If their doctor is good and honest, he gives the free drugs to his patients to help them with drug expenses, or to just try the drug before the patient has to spend money on something he/she can't tolerate. That is supposed to be what these free drugs are used for and not for hoarding for exclusive use of the doctor, his family and work force.

Post
Jun 3

Canoochee

v No, they shouldn't

Post
Jun 2

Mark_Hinkle

v No, they shouldn't

Haven't we learned anything from both alcohol and drug prohibitions? Bands don't work. I've received free samples of medicines given to doctors. Those who would ban this practice are trying to increase my cost of drugs. Why?

Post
May 31

busseja

v No, they shouldn't

who would ban them? Don't we have too much government already?

Post
May 29

InquisitiveMe

v Yes, they should

I've seen firsthand (as an RN) how this works, including being prescribed certain new antibiotics because the physician was trying to earn "points" with the pharmaceutical company. In one case, the antibiotic came on to the market with mixed results and ended up being withdrawn because it was toxic to the liver in some people (I was one of them; I recovered). By the same token, several young physicians have pointed out how much money is spent on meaningless promotional "window-dressing" ads for pharmaceuticals that are placed in media targeted toward physicians. The whole system is rotten.

Post
u

May 27

tomincali

v Yes, they should

and all in office should be charged with taking bribes when taking money from any outside the country. yet we have a president that the drug cartel supports,sent him money and when caught sent it back,wink wink. says it all about the pres,when drug dealers support you you know you are dirty.

Post
May 24

Nurse8493

v Yes, they should

Pharmaceutical gifts can be bribes. It creates a pandemic of corruption in our health care system.

Post
u

May '13

DrNickels

v Yes, they should

They are in most states. Most hospitals bar physicians from partaking in such practices already.

Post
May '13

jessejaymes

v Yes, they should

absolutely. Anyone voting no is either a pharma employee/shareholder/doctor or an outright idiot.

Post
u

May '13

vws

v No, they shouldn't

As long as they report them to the IRS on their taxes why should I care?

Post
May '13

Chomsky0

v No, they shouldn't

The government/American people should be able to negotiate drug prices like every other industrial country in the world. This is the problem. Who cares if they give gifts away.

Post
May '13

AlexNWA

v Yes, they should

Payola was outlawed for radio stations and drugs are more dangerous than bad music.Kickbacks only lead to more unnecessary drugs being pushed onto an already hypochondriac public.

Post
May '13

harold_lloyd

v Yes, they should

Not just gifts, any reward at all. And not just Pharma, every vendor or sales representative. A doctors decision to use or not use a particular drug or device should be solely based on the needs of the patient.

Post
May '13

TerryConklin

v No, they shouldn't

It's their right but we need to be aware that the doc doesn't always have our health in mind.

Post
May '13

PJS1973

v Yes, they should

It's immoral, and leads to doctors making adulterated choices.

Post
May '13

ZombieMedic

v Yes, they should

I like the perks I get, but still I think people would be better served if they didn't try to bribe us so much.

B1

r2 replies

Post
May '13

zeke

What really burns me up is to be sitting in a doctors office waiting for who knows how long, when some attractive young woman comes through the door carring the big black bag. And everyone in the waiting thinks, oh no, its a drug rep, our wait just became a little longer! The doctor would serve his patients much better if he/she used their own judgement on what drug is better for the patient, even a drug that has been on the market for a while, rather than the new drug being pushed by the pretty blonde drug rep handing out all the perks.

B1

@zeke Post
May '13

ZombieMedic

@zeke Depends on how perky the rep is. heh heh JK! But that's not unheard of either! If you think waiting is bad now, wait another year and it will be worse.

B1

@ZombieMedic Post
May '13

DrewGrizzly

v Yes, they should

Screw the pharmaceutical companies just legalize the use of medical marijuana then we won't have to deal with that type of crap

B1

Post
R Load more comments...

Jul '12

Keyjo

v Yes, they should

Yes they should. They should also be banned from giving any campaign contributions.

B1

e55 endorsed

Post
Jul '12

ir0nw0lfe

v Yes, they should

Yes but that would shut down every drug rep in the country. Doctors currently get wined and dined bybevery drug rep who comes through their door. Free lunches, snacks, whatever. If the medicine us that beneficial it will sell itself once doctors are convinced of its effectiveness. The rest is just a bribe to get your local doc pushing their brand .

B1

e17 endorsed

Post
Jul '12

Thunderchicken

v Yes, they should

Shouldn't any type of bribery and kickbacks be illegal?

e17 endorsed

Post
u

Jul '12

JesseWeger

v No, they shouldn't

Congress has no authority to regulate gifts to and from private entities.

B1

r3 replies

e13 endorsed

Post
Jul '12

Bobolinsky

v Yes, they should

I'm torn. On the one hand, doctors and pharmaceutical companies are part of the private sector. We distinguish between the private and public sectors with regards to gifts because we recognize the blatant conflict of interest when it comes to politicians. . However, in the private sector, gifts are only a bribe if there is fraud involved. Doctors pushing a particular brand of medication without full disclosure is a conflict-of-interest. Conflicts-of-interest are invitations to fraud. . I believe doctors must accept a level of responsibility to work in the best interest of their patients. Any distrust of the doctor's intentions is dangerously close to violating that...

r7 replies

e3 endorsed

Post
u

Jul '12

kosmik

v Yes, they should

Pharmaceuticals are part of the overall healthcare problem. It is due to the gifts, kickbacks, medical office parties that have led us to be a nation of pill poppers. Rather than seek to cure ills, which has a limited profit potential, we are instead strung out on substances which merely address the symptoms, ignore the underlying problem and create more trouble with adverse side effects.

B1

e1 endorsed

Post
Jul '12

Pookie

v No, they shouldn't

They should be able to as long as any member of congress can receive anything from a lobbyist, interest group, or other person advocating. I know health care providers are much less likely to be swayed by a pharmaceutical rep than a congressional rep is from a lobbyist offering goodies.

B1

e1 endorsed

Post
May '13

lawnmowrman

v Yes, they should

The gift giving in exchange for promoting new drugs leads doctors to treat patients like guinea pigs. My doctor gives samples to try for a week. What is wrong with doctor's today? They should decide from all available prescription drugs which would best treat a condition. My doctor prescribed Advair which almost killed me. Not one year passed before he tried to get me to take Advair again. What an ass! He had forgotten my case and did not review my paperwork before recommending the drug that put me in a hospital room after only five days use. I remind my doctor, every time I visit him, that I am not a guinea pig, and he will not treat me like one.

B2

Post