No Bush did not lie or he would have been prosecuted,,you and all those who keep saying so have no proof. If he lied then so did plenty of dems.
One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

Now pray tell,,where did they get the intell to validate them saying that?????? Why did Clinton bomb Iraq?? Just for chits and giggles?? Why 11 years of sanctions making thousands refugees and many starving (Food For Oil) See either even the dems thought so too or they let people die based on nothing. One little report from one intell person,,,,did not negate 11 years of other intell and actions against Saddam. The mess was dropped in Bush's lap because the last thing Clinton needed in his legacy (after tainting it-with the Monica thing) was a war or failed attempt at removing Saddam.