THIS is a mute question ~ it has already occurred and is gone from the public forum ~ might as well drop this one; BTW does anyone ever go back over these to CULL the 'old/dead' debates, so I don't waste my time paging through them..... I am retired, why don't you hire me to dump these......
Obama is clearly our candid for re-election as our president for the next four years. I don't trust Romney or believe he telling the truth and keeps changing why why we should vote for him. If President Obama was white, how many more would vote for him as president? The past four years, the republicans have been trying to create fear in American voters for this coming election about President Obama. If Obama was white, what negative would the Republicans use then? Changes take time and when changes doesn't happen over night, people fear and want to go back to old ways. Don't fear Obama and give the man a chance. Look back in history how well a president succeeded the second term. Was it improvement or the fact all along, change take time before you see the effect finally coming. Think of Roosevelt and the great depression, did changes happen over night? Think!
It's a no brainer after having seen "2016 Obama's America" and "Dreams From My Real Father"! I always suspected Obama to be a radical from the start and have always had a bad feeling about him before he was elected the first time...I knew he was lying to U.S. and I was right! Not to mention his record is terrible too!
I don't understand how more people don't see right through Romney. People don't pay attention; they don't understand how deregulation and collusion between politicians and corporate tycoons are what killed our economy. People haven't noticed the economists who have been yelling about it and writing book warning us of economic disaster for 10 years. It was all projected- the housing bubble, the recession, everything- years in advance, based on our economic policies. How can Obama be responsible for something that was projected based on past policies??? Obama gets a 1000 points from me for having the balls to ask the question "Do you really think too much regulation has been the problem?" This was a challenge to us to go do our homework.
Mister Romney has stated several times everything he does not like about Mister Obamas initiatives, however he has not offered up any of his own ideas to solve these problems. This was a very one sided debate with Mister Obama clearly winning.
You don't win a debate by interrupting or talking last or talking more. You win it by having better ideas or plans. It is clear Romney has neither. Imo his strategy was If you can't dazzle them with brilliance baffle them with bull s**t
Romney came out swinging from the opening bell, and that set the tone. Obama was defensive the entire night, with Romney answering every charge he made, and things he didn't get the chance to bring up. Mitt dominated.
Somebody should have told Obama not to lie about Romney because unlike the lap-dog media, Romney will expose his lying ass. BREAKING NEWS.... President Obama calls home after debate, "Start packing baby, we're done"
I did not hear any detailed plains from Mittens. It's all magic, we just need to trust him. He's going to give millions in tax breaks to the rich and they are going to go buy Rolex watches and Bentleys and then that money will trickle down to us. We saved! In reality they will move there money out of the country just like mittens has and we will be all the worse for his plan.
I think Obama will be a lot more careful when he asks business and economic questions around a guy who knows how to build things and how the economy really works. Romney did well, not perfect but much stronger than many predicted. I thinly Obama list round 1. The challenger always gets the bump when this happens.