pWould you support legalizing gay marriage in your state?

Next>

Results

56 %

Yes, I would

44 %

No, I wouldn't

@Jan '13 c 589 comments V 1,419 votes

Detailed Results Next Debate Vote Now

Activity Stmts Popular

1419 Votes

8 min
louisrogers496 endorsed Cosmonaut

v Yes, I would
u

25 min
DesignerLM voted

v No, I wouldn't
u

1 hr

theroadtohell1

v No, I wouldn't

If homosexuality is normal as the gays would have you believe then why are the males born with testicles sperm only serves one purpose,and why are the females born with a womb and produce eggs that need to be fertilised with the sperm,homosexuality is simply not natural and is more so a neurological disorder . I

Post
u

7 hr
Graydog voted

v Yes, I would
9 hr
bushMaster63 voted

v No, I wouldn't
13 hr
doggie_luv voted

v Yes, I would
14 hr
Krissy012000 voted

v No, I wouldn't
u

15 hr
DonEros voted

v No, I wouldn't
16 hr
DamnGunslinger voted

v No, I wouldn't
16 hr

Skid-roader

v No, I wouldn't

We cannot have this sickness in Arkansas, nor its sins of homosexuality. God forbid, and in so; he has made this very clear for the homo's. God made man in his image, and i see no trace of a queer or fag in God. The thought of man humping man is the worse site one could ever see as a pleasure of sex, but only in the pleasure of mental sickness can this be decribe.To have more respect for yourself as a homo, maybe just maybe, you could buy an Arkansas goat and hide up in the hills to never be seen of again. But in truth, we in Arkansas don't won't your kind here, and never will. We are pure bled, as God intended for it to be !.

Post
16 hr
PaulJ voted

v No, I wouldn't
u

19 hr
PatrickVonRoch voted

v Yes, I would
u

19 hr
outsiderhu voted

v No, I wouldn't
21 hr
mikev9359 voted

v Yes, I would
u

21 hr
LAC voted

v No, I wouldn't
u

22 hr
Angry_man voted

v No, I wouldn't
u

Sat
chasinr33 voted

v No, I wouldn't
Sat
sillybilly1b voted

v Yes, I would
Sat
WVMountYouNear endorsed Romney2012

v No, I wouldn't
Fri
kathybush voted

v No, I wouldn't
u

Fri
AllorNothing voted

v Yes, I would
Fri
Zennbenn endorsed Cosmonaut

v Yes, I would
Fri
solodad voted

v No, I wouldn't
Fri
Stinger2 voted

v No, I wouldn't
u

Fri
LaurenM voted

v Yes, I would
Fri
lapazjim voted

v No, I wouldn't
u

Fri
Scott3609 voted

v No, I wouldn't
u

Thu
truckguy endorsed jessejaymes

v No, I wouldn't
u

Thu
Maestro333 endorsed Cosmonaut

v Yes, I would
u

May 16
Obsidion voted

v No, I wouldn't
May 16
shadowfire voted

v Yes, I would
u

May 16
Theocrat voted

v No, I wouldn't
May 16
okienomore54 endorsed jessejaymes

v No, I wouldn't
May 16
JWhite voted

v Yes, I would
May 16
Mr_me endorsed Cosmonaut

v Yes, I would
May 16
judya1986 voted

v Yes, I would
u

May 15
Bingo35 endorsed Cosmonaut

v Yes, I would
May 15
Hannah41 voted

v Yes, I would
May 15
Middle0road voted

v No, I wouldn't
May 15
Conservative5 voted

v No, I wouldn't
u

May 15
jjme9 endorsed Cool_voter

v Yes, I would
u

May 15
sspphoto endorsed Romney2012

v No, I wouldn't
May 15

ST_Louie_Sue

v No, I wouldn't

They tried it and my state voted it down by 81%.

Post
May 15
peacetree99 voted

v Yes, I would
May 14
cpt_chernobyl voted

v Yes, I would
u

May 14

oldsolder

v No, I wouldn't

Marriage is between a man and a women. I am sick of having this issue shoved in my face. There is a reason two men or two women can't have a child together and it's pretty GD obvious why. I am told I have to except them for who they really are, NO I DON"T, well there is no "I was born in the wrong body" it doesn't work that way, it is them that are not accepting themselves for who they really are. Two men having sex with each other doesn't constitute love and is no more natural than a man and goat having sex, it's wrong and disgusting. It's just as disgusting as a pedophile going after little kids, it's wrong and digesting.

Post
May 14
fantasyflygon voted

v Yes, I would
u

May 14

topcattopcat

v No, I wouldn't

You can make laws which legalize marrying an aardvark, but what would be the point? Marriage is about the union of a man and a woman primarily, to create children. Two men can't do that and two women can't do that. The funny thing is if gay men could only marry gay men and gay women could only marry gay women, the gay issue would disappear in a generation or so. The fact that this is being debated shows how screwed up this country is. Besides, if two women get divorced how would the judge know who to screw over. The judge would have to select two men and take everything from them to give to the two women in their divorce.

B1

Post
May 14
littlewolf8469 voted

v Yes, I would
u

May 14
LLS207 voted

v Yes, I would

u

1 hr

theroadtohell1

v No, I wouldn't

If homosexuality is normal as the gays would have you believe then why are the males born with testicles sperm only serves one purpose,and why are the females born with a womb and produce eggs that need to be fertilised with the sperm,homosexuality is simply not natural and is more so a neurological disorder . I

Post
16 hr

Skid-roader

v No, I wouldn't

We cannot have this sickness in Arkansas, nor its sins of homosexuality. God forbid, and in so; he has made this very clear for the homo's. God made man in his image, and i see no trace of a queer or fag in God. The thought of man humping man is the worse site one could ever see as a pleasure of sex, but only in the pleasure of mental sickness can this be decribe.To have more respect for yourself as a homo, maybe just maybe, you could buy an Arkansas goat and hide up in the hills to never be seen of again. But in truth, we in Arkansas don't won't your kind here, and never will. We are pure bled, as God intended for it to be !.

Post
May 15

ST_Louie_Sue

v No, I wouldn't

They tried it and my state voted it down by 81%.

Post
u

May 14

oldsolder

v No, I wouldn't

Marriage is between a man and a women. I am sick of having this issue shoved in my face. There is a reason two men or two women can't have a child together and it's pretty GD obvious why. I am told I have to except them for who they really are, NO I DON"T, well there is no "I was born in the wrong body" it doesn't work that way, it is them that are not accepting themselves for who they really are. Two men having sex with each other doesn't constitute love and is no more natural than a man and goat having sex, it's wrong and disgusting. It's just as disgusting as a pedophile going after little kids, it's wrong and digesting.

Post
u

May 14

topcattopcat

v No, I wouldn't

You can make laws which legalize marrying an aardvark, but what would be the point? Marriage is about the union of a man and a woman primarily, to create children. Two men can't do that and two women can't do that. The funny thing is if gay men could only marry gay men and gay women could only marry gay women, the gay issue would disappear in a generation or so. The fact that this is being debated shows how screwed up this country is. Besides, if two women get divorced how would the judge know who to screw over. The judge would have to select two men and take everything from them to give to the two women in their divorce.

B1

Post
u

May 14

JoeSchmoe123

v No, I wouldn't

The only way it pass int NY was the paying off of various Senators.. Namely Roy McDonald from Mike Bloomberg.. If the people had their say it never would have gotten passed, instead its forced down our throats. Ask the 33 other states that did vote against SSM, see what their populous says.. The idea that America wants SSM is a myth consider also two thirds states have already said no.. Let no forget Liberal California as well and Prop 8, but I guess there opinions don't count, even in a vote

Post
May 13

PJS1973

v Yes, I would

As long as churches, mosques, synagogues, et al. that have religious concerns are not forced to perform the ceremony, I am all for taxpaying Americans enjoying their rights.

Post
May 12

Jaybird1964

v Yes, I would

I think we should abolish all laws involving marriage...not a government issue!!!!

Post
May 12

bigern1939

v Yes, I would

Why is the government involved in love?

Post
o

May 11

Falasha_Jew

v No, I wouldn't

Homosexuality runs against the Holy Bible, against Nature, against science, and it is still punishable by death in most wise nonwhite countries where people still have strong ethics and morals. Nothing good for America will ever come from legalizing this filthy anti-life unnatural behavior.

Post
May 10

alisonstormx

v Yes, I would

if you dont like gay marriage dont get one! <3

Post
May 10

shamus70

v Yes, I would

Love is love and if god says it's wrong, she ain't god and it doesn't matter anyway!

Post
May 10

marysrus13

v No, I wouldn't

I don't think marriage should exist for anyone, anywhere. I think marriages should simply be formed as a Legal Partnership under the law where medical/DNA proof of parenthood is filed with birth certificates to clarify inheritance. Conflating Emotion with Legal Process was a bad decision in the first place. If people choose to bond with religious/spiritual blessing and call that Marriage - okay. If people want to have huge, expensive celebrations of the partnership formation - okay. Marriage has no strings - Legal Partnerships have very particular ones.

Post
May 9

whip

v Yes, I would

I really don't care what others do in their bedroom, I don't think anyone has the right to tell me or anyone else how to live my life.

Post
May 9

TerryConklin

v Yes, I would

All of us have the right to be "married" if we choose to be. I do think the term "Marriage" might be left to those who have religions with a marriage ceremony and "Civil Unions" be the term used by all married people. Why cause a stir with semantics?

Post
May 8

FortyforSixty

v No, I wouldn't

I would first have to believe that being gay is a normal, born trait. I do not, so obviously I don't believe in gay marriage.

Post
u

May 7

Jed_i

v Yes, I would

You know what they'll call gay marriage 20 years from now? Marriage.

Post
u

May 7

mejiakay1986

v Yes, I would

I think no one has the right to say anything about anyone or what they should be able to do if they are happy they should be able to get married just like us and hell yea I support this who wouldn't.

Post
May 7

DuckISays

v No, I wouldn't

Choose another word. "Marriage" is a Biblical doctrine between one man and one woman. This is not about "equality." This is about taking a word from one group and giving it to another group to which it does not apply. I do not wish to dictate whom a person loves, cares for, and supports. But the word "marriage" is not the State's word. It does not belong to the government. The government does not sanction "marriage." The Almighty God sanctions marriage between one man and one woman and is a part of said marriage. Many gays are anti-Bible anyway, so why do they want to use the terminology for the only sort of union that comes from the Bible? They need to cho...

B1

r6 replies

Post
u

May 9

SamSpade

There is no validity to your claims: marriage as an institution is older than the Bible, and it's legally a secular contract between consenting adults. There is no requirement for any religion in marriage by law and unless you want non-Christians or atheists' marriages to be nullified, it looks like your explanations do not work. So basically, you either have a problem with non-Christians getting married (regardless of the couple's sexes), or you're just trying to justify your bigotry. The facts aren't on your side, because THIS is Biblical marriage: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/04/the-varieties-of-biblical-marriage/

Post @SamSpade
May 9

JesusLivesInMe

I agree, but I'll go one step further. Marriage is not JUST Biblical. It was designed by God in the BEGINNING before a Bible was ever written.. He created man, and then woman out of mans rib, and that's why the 2 become one. Because, in essence, they are one being. So a man can not become 'one' with another man and a woman can not become 'one' with another woman. So the homosexuals are making a mockery of something beautiful that God (JESUS) created AND flaunting it in His face. May He have mercy... "Many gays are anti-Bible anyway, so why do they want to use the terminology for the only sort of union that comes from the Bible?" That's so true, but what's worse is...

Post @JesusLivesInMe
May 9

DuckISays

@SamSpade A difference of opinion is not the same thing as bigotry. I do not bully anyone. I do not persecute gays. I don't believe I once belittled anyone in my statement. Indeed, I am a bigot, but this statement has no relevance to my vast bigotry which includes liberals in general, and not homosexuals as a group.

Post @DuckISays
May 9

DuckISays

@JesusLivesInMe I believe God will judge all of us for all of our sins. I have difficulty believing a homosexual Christian is any different from being an alcoholic Christian or a child-neglecting Christian or a homewrecking Christian, et.al., in the eyes of God. I, for one, will never say I'm a "good Christian." I'm a sinner. I'm not judging the homosexual's sin. But I do not think they should use a word that is clearly not intended for them to use to condone their unions. Thanks for your reply. God bless.

B1

Post @DuckISays
May 10

JesusLivesInMe

@DuckISays Oh I agree, homosexual Christians are no different than any other Christian (except that they're committing abomination) they wont go to hell for being homosexual as we're ALL sinners and deserve to go to hell. Their abomination will be forgiven on judgment day just as our sins are because JESUS already paid the price for our sins.. So, I hope you don't think I'm saying homosexuals will go to hell for being a homosexual. If that's not what you thought than I must have misunderstood what you said. "I'm not judging the homosexual's sin" We're not judging their sin, God (JESUS) has already judged the sin, now we're just reporting it so it's not judging; it's ...

Post @JesusLivesInMe
View all 6 replies >
May 6

randy28

v No, I wouldn't

I don't care what a person do in their bedroom but I don't like the fact people trying to change the meaning of marriage. it's been already defined as a between man and a woman for thousands of years.

Post
R Load more comments...

Nov '12

Cosmonaut

v Yes, I would

Absolutely. Despite whatever you believe, you do not have the right to diminish the right for all citizens to be equal. There is no good reason to deny people the right to marriage and the benefits that come along with it other than to satisfy your own prejudices.

B4

r4 replies

e166 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

Romney2012

v No, I wouldn't

I beleive marriage is a sacred constitution only for a man and a woman.

B1

r20 replies

e98 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

ultimaistanza

v Yes, I would

There is no rational reason to oppose or deny same sex marriage.

B2

r1 reply

e45 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

jessejaymes

v No, I wouldn't

I have no problem with gays entering into a civil union as straights do. But the word marriage is the word of a civil union between a man and a woman. Always has been. Never been a society where it wasn't. You can call a goat a cow if you like. It doesn't make it a cow.

B1

r6 replies

e27 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

marine1

v No, I wouldn't

I do not agree with a gay life style. It is wrong.

B2

r11 replies

e24 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

BravoJuliet

v No, I wouldn't

How as a Christian, can I support it and serve God too? For me it's against everything natural, healthy, and Godly!

r12 replies

e26 endorsed

Post
o

Nov '12

Cool_voter

v Yes, I would

If you don't "believe" in gay marriage because of your "religion" than DON'T BE GAY. Other than that it's none of your dang business

e16 endorsed

Post
u

Nov '12

commonsense51

v No, I wouldn't

Gay marriage, yet one more lie from Obama. Remember when he was against Gay marriage to get elected the first time? What person on this planet thought the most liberal president in our history was actually against gay marriage. Obama is a phony and after getting elected, and found he was losing support from his base, he decided to have an epiphany and support Gay marriage. All I can say about Gay marriage is that this is one more example of a nation that censored God from our public square. This vacuum was filled by the New age Liberal self love movement. Anything goes and when you have a left wing media on your side, you can convince people that up is down, and if you...

B1

r9 replies

e11 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

Karl0528

v Yes, I would

There are far bigger issues plaguing American society than whether two people of the same sex should be allowed to wed.

B2

e8 endorsed

Post
u

Nov '12

riggers

v No, I wouldn't

I would support ending "legal" marriages and all the "benefits" the govt gives to both homo and heterosexual marriages and making marriages a religious ceremony as it began.

B2

e5 endorsed

Post

Politix

pWould you support legalizing gay marriage in your state?

Results