Comments (view in Forum)

  • !
    @IraqWarVeteran I think Marco just blew it. no one is seeking an anti science president. Palin will clean his clock if that how he wants to run. Just dumb thing for him to sat
  • !
    He is certainly a straight shooter and at least speaks his mind. Obama will tell you that he is a Christian if it means getting your vote, but will ignore every Christian principle or acknowledgement that exists thereafter.
  • View all 44 replies >
  • !
    How is it intellectually dishonest for a non-scientist to say he's not a scientist and that he really doesn't know? I'd say it's a reasonable response to a stupid gotcha question.
  • !
    @Hireman - I'd say that by not including the view of science as one of the alternatives, he is being intellectually dishonest.
  • !
    Science doesn't really know either. It is all theory. The Bible does NOT say it was seven 24 hour days, btw, really it doesn't. Rubio is right, we cannot possibly know the answer and it doesn't have anything to do with the economy. It is just another "gotcha" question aimed at disqualifing a candidate four years before an election.
  • !
    @MRMacrum So to be intellectually honest, you have to try to represent every view? He gave a neutral answer and signified he didn't know. That's as honest as any reasonable person should expect.
  • !
    @Hireman - "That's as honest as any reasonable person should expect."

    .......... I'm going to go with it is as honest as any pol from the Right could be expected to come up with.
  • View all 47 replies >
  • !
    Yep, agree. But was I the only one that read "Rubio's implied view that the earth was created within the last 10,000 years is shared by 46% of Americans, according to a Gallup Poll.". Does that poll have a =/- of 1%??(think that would make it 47%.........bahaha)
  • !
    It is hard not to scream aloud when reading such unintelligent, uninformed statements coming from someone with pretensions to power. Yes, we do know how old the planet is. No, it is not 7,000 years old. And just a few days ago a prominent Republican was saying the GOP has got to stop being the party of stupid. They sure have a long way to go when this is the quality of the folks The Tea Party shoves in.
  • !
    When you actually take a look at the choices the Republican Party has as potential candates, well there ain't much hope for'em. None whatsoever. The Grand Old Party is now just The Old Planters Party.
  • !
    Who says "WE" know how old the earth is? How do YOU know how old the earth is? Did YOU read it out of a Book? Well ,so did I! The Author of the book I read was there when it happened. The author of yours wasn't even born.And i can't say that I am impressed with the jerks in YOUR crummy party.
  • !
    @Electro I read the same book you did and am a Christian, too. I just don't mistake a book that is about morals and worship for a science textbook.
  • !
    @Zazziness Oh, really a"science" textbook written by folks that were not present when the earth and universe evlolved, fumbled, bumbled iitsef into being. And God? He just sat on the sidelines and watched it happen. And I'm stupid because I don't believe this foolishness?
  • !
    @Electro Well, I wouldn't say stupid but I would say stubborn and ill-informed. Scientists are not taking wild guesses about how it all happened. Multiple disciplines of science can present evidence our planet is billions of years old. Overwhelming evidence, in fact. As for what God was doing while the universe formed? That's a different question entirely. And that one is appropriate for the theologians. It isn't science or religion. You just have to use holy texts for their purpose and science texts for theirs.
  • !
    Thank you Marco. Welcome to the Palin, Bachman, Santorum, Huckabie crowd. It's good to see another intellectual giant speak up.
  • !
    You would have to be utterly, utterly stupid to hold the view that the age of the Earth is anything less than a billion years. That is because you would be contradicting the entire planet's population of geologists, in every nation on Earth. So you would only hold that view if if you don't realize what the problem is with contradicting an entire civilization's scientific knowledge. Which is why I said: utterly, utterly, stupid.

    The only qualification to that is for people who have not attended an educational establishment that was influenced by the Enlightenment.
  • !
    Another Rocket scientist of the GOP.Hahahahahah.Their Coming out of the wall or the GOP is now looking in their walls for sometime to use to Run again.Maybe they can use Mitt again after all he only Blew 1 billion on his Epic fiasco.They called a campain.
  • !
    Damn these people are like cockroaches, you just can't get rid of them. Why do these idiots have to shove their faith in everyone's face? I'm content to let the idiots think the earth was created in 6 days, I don't go around shoving evidence, and basic logic in their face.
  • !
    He is right in what he has a politician should be focused on and that parents can teach their kids their beliefs. After that he's wrong.
    The earth is over 4 million years own and science should be looked to for answers about science. And he kind of hinted that alternate mythologies should be taught alongside science. If you go to private school it's stupid but whatever. Public school? Lets stick with scientific consensus.
  • !
    @Cheenoguy - Not a mundane detail maybe. But just a typo is all. Honestly I do not understand why how old the Earth is so damn important to both sides of the argument. Just another issue to complicate the political conversation and distract us from the balls we really should be keeping our eyes on.
  • !
    @MRMacrum
    I really don't care if people want to believe in creation. I don't want it taught in schools. I'm also frustrated with this idea that there are two sets of facts.
  • !
    @Cheenoguy - Two sets of Facts? I don't know about the facts of evolution other than they are more logically laid out. The other set is based on unreasoning faith in a kind of "I know this guy and he told me ....."
  • View all 8 replies >
  • !
    Rubio's "answer" is yet another example of a fool with power. Theologians guess (and poorly, at that), while science uses technologies to discover facts.
  • !
    @MRMacrum OK...So? pandering is what politicians do. Weather it's to the LGBT or Religion, they all pander. At least he was right about it not being an important issue for politics.
  • !
    @FollowTheMoney - I will agree that it shouldn't be an important issue. But that is not exactly what he was doing, was it? He was playing both sides.
  • !
    @MRMacrum Oh I know, but that's what they do. It's like making an issue about smelly poop. The pundit's are just laying the ground work for next election. It's business as usual.
  • R Load more comments...