pShould Obama nominate Susan Rice as Secretary of State?

Next>

Results

61 %

No, he shouldn't

27 %

Yes, he should

8 %

I don't care either way

1 more option

@Nov '12 c 69 comments V 222 votes

Detailed Results Next Debate Vote Now

Activity Stmts Popular

222 Votes

u

16 hr
DrSilicon voted

v No, he shouldn't
u

u

Thu
catmanii endorsed mountain-folk

v No, he shouldn't
u

Wed
The_Bald_Guy voted

v No, he shouldn't
May 15
Malitia_Man endorsed Ashstop

v No, he shouldn't
May 14
Mournwolf voted

v No, he shouldn't
u

May 13
Kcincurrie voted

v No, he shouldn't
u

May 12
SlimElmo91 voted

v Yes, he should
May 12
Fyi1957 endorsed Neo_NtheMatrix

v No, he shouldn't
May 12
DanielZ voted

v Yes, he should
May 12
Bill2E endorsed Ashstop

v No, he shouldn't
u

May 9
LilliB voted

v No, he shouldn't
u

May 9
Bill voted

v No, he shouldn't
u

u

May 9
farmer_bruce endorsed mountain-folk

v No, he shouldn't
May 9
oldtimer2 endorsed Ashstop

v No, he shouldn't
u

May 8
sml11 endorsed harold

v I'm not sure
May 8
mudpike voted

v No, he shouldn't
u

May 8
DemonsAngel13 endorsed jessejaymes

v I don't care either way
May 7
PaulUK2901 voted

v Yes, he should
u

May 7
buckilaked voted

v I'm not sure
May 7
ZombieMedic voted

v No, he shouldn't
u

May 5
URBS voted

v No, he shouldn't
u

May 4
mxdirtdude endorsed jessejaymes

v I don't care either way
u

May 4

fraps

v Yes, he should

She fits well with the administration. She lies with a straight face. Does a member of Obama's administration need more of a qualification than that?

Post
May 2
Spirit02 endorsed jessejaymes

v I don't care either way
u

May 2

IMAQT

v Yes, he should

Just to tick off John Kerry.

Post
May 2

cat2009

v No, he shouldn't

A proven liar should not be rewarded.

Post
May 2
Keystroke voted

v Yes, he should
Apr 30

harold_lloyd

v No, he shouldn't

She'd probably be okay in the position, but with the senate full of blustering idiots, she wouldn't have a chance of winning approval.

Post
u

Apr 30
kimmie99 voted

v No, he shouldn't
u

Apr 30
PaulBartomioli endorsed mountain-folk

v No, he shouldn't
Apr 30
engineerdva voted

v I don't care either way
Apr 30
loganrollo endorsed Ashstop

v No, he shouldn't
u

Apr 29
treedcat25 endorsed MBernard

v Yes, he should
Apr 29
Doctordub endorsed WMCOL

v I'm not sure
u

Apr 29

BossTweed

v No, he shouldn't

No. TeamObama used her to broadcast the Benghazi lies on National TV. Then disavowed her statements as inaccurate. She is damaged goods now. Sadly she let herself be a pawn for TeamObama.

Post
u

Apr 29
iraya voted

v No, he shouldn't
Apr 28
Ktulue voted

v No, he shouldn't
Apr 28
darkmoonman endorsed MBernard

v Yes, he should
u

Apr 28
Mr_Galt voted

v No, he shouldn't
u

Apr 28
tdogz voted

v No, he shouldn't
Apr 27
awbaldridge endorsed MBernard

v Yes, he should
Apr 27
Mnementh voted

v I don't care either way
u

Apr 27
blueberrysyrup voted

v No, he shouldn't
u

Apr 27
toledodude voted

v I don't care either way
Apr 26
Fitz endorsed jessejaymes

v I don't care either way
u

Apr 25
1934BEAR voted

v No, he shouldn't
Apr 25
Ryuo voted

v No, he shouldn't
Feb '13
Deste66 voted

v No, he shouldn't
o

o

Jan '13
LikkerdySplit endorsed Creole

v I don't care either way
u

Dec '12
MsKnowItAll voted

v No, he shouldn't

u

May 4

fraps

v Yes, he should

She fits well with the administration. She lies with a straight face. Does a member of Obama's administration need more of a qualification than that?

Post
u

May 2

IMAQT

v Yes, he should

Just to tick off John Kerry.

Post
May 2

cat2009

v No, he shouldn't

A proven liar should not be rewarded.

Post
Apr 30

harold_lloyd

v No, he shouldn't

She'd probably be okay in the position, but with the senate full of blustering idiots, she wouldn't have a chance of winning approval.

Post
u

Apr 29

BossTweed

v No, he shouldn't

No. TeamObama used her to broadcast the Benghazi lies on National TV. Then disavowed her statements as inaccurate. She is damaged goods now. Sadly she let herself be a pawn for TeamObama.

Post
Nov '12

Skyclmbr

v No, he shouldn't

In my opinion: I think he wants her in there for one reason! She is willing to lie for him!

Post
Nov '12

kenderhulk

v Yes, he should

If Condo can she can

Post
u

Nov '12

realist

v No, he shouldn't

Stupid revealed herself.

Post
Nov '12

Keyjo

v I'm not sure

I really don't know enough about her to have an opinion. I am really sorry to see Hillary resign, but I know she is exhausted and needs the time to rest before she runs for President in 2016. I am sure there are many qualified people who could serve. Personally, I'd like to see Bill Clinton, Bill Richardson or Jon Huntsman. Heck, maybe even Chris Christie or Bobby Jindal. Mix it up a little bit. As we have witnessed recently among these people, even the Hatfield/McCoy feud had to end eventually.

Post
u

Nov '12

MissMostly

v No, he shouldn't

Susan Rice should not be the next Sec. of State. She may have been a good pick at one time but not now. To me she shows that she will lie for Obama and we ALREADY have enough of that going on!! Also, this is not about the almighty race card or female card!! I am a member of the HUMAN race just like she is, and a female!!

Post
Nov '12

scotta

v No, he shouldn't

Her reputation is shot. She is just another mouth piece for the "Banner". Nobody would believe anything she would say after the killing of 4 Americans died due to a U-Tube cljp

Post
Nov '12

MarkJM

v No, he shouldn't

Her credibility is shot. I'm sure there are others out there that are more qualified than she to take up that position.

Post
Nov '12

1adam2

v No, he shouldn't

but i am sure, no matter who he appoints. stupid is, as the more stupid does.

Post
o

Nov '12

sabbatical

v I don't care either way

Should Susan Rice Replace Obama as US President?

Post
Nov '12

GetAwake

v No, he shouldn't

Too controversial. He needs to seek out another candidate. His choice in this matter will either show the kind of leader he's become or what kind of spoiled-child he really always has been...depending on how he decides to go.

Post
u

Nov '12

Belin

v No, he shouldn't

President Obama already used her by sending her to the media with a story that wasn't true. Now we don't know if she's a yes (wo)man. Can she stand up to him like Hilary has done? Hillary proved herself to be strong. I don't want someone who is going to agree with the President on everything. The Sectetary of State should be someone that pulls the Prrsident aside and gives his or her opinion when they think he is wrong.

Post
Nov '12

FaFoxy

v No, he shouldn't

Susan Rice LIED. People DIED. What did The Obamaniac know and when did he know it. As DEMOCRATIC Senator Diane Feinstein has repeatedly said, ONLY impeachment hearings will get to the truth. The Obamaniac LIED. People DIED. What did The Obamaniac know and when did he know it ?

Post
Nov '12

SmartAlec

v No, he shouldn't

No, she's a mindless robot who just repeats Obummer's lies for him. Hillary was in town and should have made the case for the administration but she refused to lie -- this time! Afraid she would be caught AGAIN which might not bode well for her bid in 2016 when she will be an even more-wrinkled, worn-out hag! [By the way, Mz. Rice was the one who advised Slick Willie (Clinton) NOT to capture or kill Bin Laden when we had him captured and our soldiers asked for Clinton's permission. Instead of having any balls, 'Slick' turned to Rice for the decision and she refused, thereby enabling Bin Laden to commit 9-11 a couple of years later. Rice is yet another 'brilliant' polit...

Post
Nov '12

FADavisIII

v No, he shouldn't

Susan Rice and Barrack Obama should both be arrested for treason. There is a long list of crimes I think Obama is guilty of, but I'll get to that another day. She should be put on trial and upon being convicted of treason she should be drawn and quartered. This all should be broadcast live on abc, nbc, & cbs. As for the one who ordered her to lie to the American people to protect terrorists and jihadists, he (Obama) doesn't deserve to be treated as good as her.

B3

r2 replies

e2 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

Keyjo

If George Bush Jr. and Dick Cheney weren't arrested high crimes and treason, then there's certainly no legitimate reason to prosecute Obama or Rice.

Post @Keyjo
Nov '12

FADavisIII

@Keyjo I couldn't agree more. Bush for sure because he was in charge. Unfortunately it's kinda like too late. The Bush administration's many epic screw ups that put our economy in the gutter and started a war for no valid reason are old news. We can't do anything about that now, but Obama is currently engaged in anti-American activities that make Bush look like a choir boy. We are Americans first and Democrats, Republicans, libertarians, and etc. second, if you are so inclined. That means if we as Americans elect a president who feels that he should lie to the American people about a terrorist attack on our soil that resulted in the deaths of 4 Americans including ...

Post @FADavisIII
Nov '12

WMCOL

v I'm not sure

Her comments about Bengahzi are certainly not enough to determine her fittness for the office. If everything is based on prepared statement she read then she is qualified.

e1 endorsed

Post
R Load more comments...

Nov '12

Ashstop

v No, he shouldn't

At this point her credibility is ruined, she was a scapegoat no doubt but her reputation is forever tainted, I would take anything she says now with a grain of salt, including her explanation she is presenting now

B4

r2 replies

e25 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

MBernard

v Yes, he should

I don't see why not. She's qualified.

e16 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

PNWest

v Yes, he should

She has done a good job and is eminently qualified. In addition to that she is hated by a lot of the irrational folks of the GOP. Nominate her and provoke a fight over her. The American public will get to watch the clowns in action against her and either she will get the nomination or the GOP will make bigger fools of themselves which will help in 2014.

r4 replies

e10 endorsed

Post
u

Nov '12

mountain-folk

v No, he shouldn't

No Ms. Rice will continue the Obama policy of delivering countries, there weapons and more foreign aid from American working folks to the Moslem Brotherhood; who hate what we, the majority of the American people once stood for. Congress should use the hearings to grill her about the lies she and Obama told after the facts were known, Finally she will be a loyal agent of Obamaâs plan to destroy America, its Military, economy and the hard working Americans people; who are now being taxed to death and bankrupted to support the generations of parasites and those new moochers pouring in to our country illegally.

B1

r1 reply

e8 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

jessejaymes

v I don't care either way

doesn't matter to me. It won't change anything one way or the other. We'll still send billions to petty dictators playing every side of the fence and we'll still war for the profit of the ultra rich and our kids will still die for those profits. Same as it ever was.

e5 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

FADavisIII

v No, he shouldn't

Susan Rice and Barrack Obama should both be arrested for treason. There is a long list of crimes I think Obama is guilty of, but I'll get to that another day. She should be put on trial and upon being convicted of treason she should be drawn and quartered. This all should be broadcast live on abc, nbc, & cbs. As for the one who ordered her to lie to the American people to protect terrorists and jihadists, he (Obama) doesn't deserve to be treated as good as her.

B3

r2 replies

e2 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

Keyjo

If George Bush Jr. and Dick Cheney weren't arrested high crimes and treason, then there's certainly no legitimate reason to prosecute Obama or Rice.

Post @Keyjo
Nov '12

FADavisIII

@Keyjo I couldn't agree more. Bush for sure because he was in charge. Unfortunately it's kinda like too late. The Bush administration's many epic screw ups that put our economy in the gutter and started a war for no valid reason are old news. We can't do anything about that now, but Obama is currently engaged in anti-American activities that make Bush look like a choir boy. We are Americans first and Democrats, Republicans, libertarians, and etc. second, if you are so inclined. That means if we as Americans elect a president who feels that he should lie to the American people about a terrorist attack on our soil that resulted in the deaths of 4 Americans including ...

Post @FADavisIII
Nov '12

artjeb

v No, he shouldn't

NO. But she will get nominated because more inteligent people vote no.Thats the way OBAMA opperates. AGINST the will of the people. Just after the election he said something about NOW listening to the people. In one ear & out the other ear

B1

r2 replies

e3 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

Neo_NtheMatrix

v No, he shouldn't

NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

B2

e1 endorsed

Post
u

Nov '12

seedtick

v No, he shouldn't

She is "damaged goods." Her credibility on the world stage will always be suspect now that she has lied publically....makes no difference if she created the lie or not, she owns the mouth it came out of. Her appointment will be seen as a payoff from Barack Husssein Obama.

B1

e2 endorsed

Post
Nov '12

Creole

v I don't care either way

In the grand scheme of things this position isn't worth the argument.

e2 endorsed

Post

Politix

pShould Obama nominate Susan Rice as Secretary of State?

Results