u Thu cpier14 v No, it's not I think responsibility is the first right that is fundamental ! let's start teaching our kids that imagine the possibilities Post
May 18 LEC v I'm not sure Rights are given by man and taken away by man.. In a time not so far from now, a smart phone will be considered a fundamental right. Never before has that happened. Healthcare is a sticky wicket.. on one hand, it has never been considered a right, but then we have never been in a situation where the Government is complicit in poisoning our food, water and air which results in a lot of sickness. So we have to decide, do we want cheap food, dirty water, and toxic air and the obscene profits that accrue to the few? If yes, then we need to collectively pay for the medical that is caused by the industry. If not, then maybe we need to stop all polluting practices, go ... Post
May 13 harold_lloyd v Yes, it is It will have to become a right or the healthcare industry will own us. If healthcare is a right, then govt can ensure that we all have access to it. Otherwise pretty soon, if you can't afford insurance, you won't get treated except on an emergency basis. Post
May 11 AlexNWA v Yes, it is Health Care should be available based on need not greed. Everyone should have the right to live a long and productive life. If we are to claim to be the best country in the world how can we allow our fellow citizens to die simply because they cannot afford simply, basic medical care. There is no reason for us to have an infant mortality rate of a Third World country simply because there is no short term profit to be had. The Health of the individual should reflect the health of the country as a whole. Post
u May 9 debido v No, it's not No it is not a right just as birth control is not a right. Hey I have acid reflux, why can't I get free heart burn medication????? Post
May 5 Mr_GO_HERD v Yes, it is Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.... Its hard to have "life" if you're healthcare is garbage. B1 Post
May 5 AndrewMC v No, it's not When I think of a fundamental right, I think of individual liberty. While it could be argued that everyone has a right to health care, this "right" requires that people other than the individual be harnessed into a system from which they may accrue no benefit. When people talk about health care as a fundamental right, they are almost always talking about some sort of collective societal act, necessary to provide this care. We have one or two other fundamental rights which we have deemed so important that society as a whole kicks in to help provide it. For example, providing defense counsel for indigents on trial. But this is a drop in the bucket when it comes to c... Post
u Thu cpier14 v No, it's not I think responsibility is the first right that is fundamental ! let's start teaching our kids that imagine the possibilities Post
May 18 LEC v I'm not sure Rights are given by man and taken away by man.. In a time not so far from now, a smart phone will be considered a fundamental right. Never before has that happened. Healthcare is a sticky wicket.. on one hand, it has never been considered a right, but then we have never been in a situation where the Government is complicit in poisoning our food, water and air which results in a lot of sickness. So we have to decide, do we want cheap food, dirty water, and toxic air and the obscene profits that accrue to the few? If yes, then we need to collectively pay for the medical that is caused by the industry. If not, then maybe we need to stop all polluting practices, go ... Post
May 13 harold_lloyd v Yes, it is It will have to become a right or the healthcare industry will own us. If healthcare is a right, then govt can ensure that we all have access to it. Otherwise pretty soon, if you can't afford insurance, you won't get treated except on an emergency basis. Post
May 11 AlexNWA v Yes, it is Health Care should be available based on need not greed. Everyone should have the right to live a long and productive life. If we are to claim to be the best country in the world how can we allow our fellow citizens to die simply because they cannot afford simply, basic medical care. There is no reason for us to have an infant mortality rate of a Third World country simply because there is no short term profit to be had. The Health of the individual should reflect the health of the country as a whole. Post
u May 9 debido v No, it's not No it is not a right just as birth control is not a right. Hey I have acid reflux, why can't I get free heart burn medication????? Post
May 5 Mr_GO_HERD v Yes, it is Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.... Its hard to have "life" if you're healthcare is garbage. B1 Post
May 5 AndrewMC v No, it's not When I think of a fundamental right, I think of individual liberty. While it could be argued that everyone has a right to health care, this "right" requires that people other than the individual be harnessed into a system from which they may accrue no benefit. When people talk about health care as a fundamental right, they are almost always talking about some sort of collective societal act, necessary to provide this care. We have one or two other fundamental rights which we have deemed so important that society as a whole kicks in to help provide it. For example, providing defense counsel for indigents on trial. But this is a drop in the bucket when it comes to c... Post
u May 3 fraps v No, it's not Next question to ask is having a Rolls Royce a fundamental right. The founding documents specify our rights. Not a single one of those rights force a citizen to provide support to a person other than his choosing. Obama care is wrong on many fronts. The worst is having the young in the country having to pay triple the value of an item that they do not want to have or buy. There is a better solution to the health care problem that is simple, probably profitable, and not particularly difficult to implement. First, prices for medical services should be posted and everyone should be charged the same price for the service provided. For those that do not have the fund... Post
u May 3 fraps v No, it's not Next question to ask is having a Rolls Royce a fundamental right. The founding documents specify our rights. Not a single one of those rights force a citizen to provide support to a person other than his choosing. Obama care is wrong on many fronts. The worst is having the young in the country having to pay triple the value of an item that they do not want to have or buy. There is a better solution to the health care problem that is simple, probably profitable, and not particularly difficult to implement. First, prices for medical services should be posted and everyone should be charged the same price for the service provided. For those that do not have the fund... Post
u May 3 fraps v No, it's not Next question to ask is having a Rolls Royce a fundamental right. The founding documents specify our rights. Not a single one of those rights force a citizen to provide support to a person other than his choosing. Obama care is wrong on many fronts. The worst is having the young in the country having to pay triple the value of an item that they do not want to have or buy. There is a better solution to the health care problem that is simple, probably profitable, and not particularly difficult to implement. First, prices for medical services should be posted and everyone should be charged the same price for the service provided. For those that do not have the fund... Post
u May 3 fraps v No, it's not Next question to ask is having a Rolls Royce a fundamental right. The founding documents specify our rights. Not a single one of those rights force a citizen to provide support to a person other than his choosing. Obama care is wrong on many fronts. The worst is having the young in the country having to pay triple the value of an item that they do not want to have or buy. There is a better solution to the health care problem that is simple, probably profitable, and not particularly difficult to implement. First, prices for medical services should be posted and everyone should be charged the same price for the service provided. For those that do not have the fund... Post
u May 3 fraps v No, it's not Next question to ask is having a Rolls Royce a fundamental right. The founding documents specify our rights. Not a single one of those rights force a citizen to provide support to a person other than his choosing. Obama care is wrong on many fronts. The worst is having the young in the country having to pay triple the value of an item that they do not want to have or buy. There is a better solution to the health care problem that is simple, probably profitable, and not particularly difficult to implement. First, prices for medical services should be posted and everyone should be charged the same price for the service provided. For those that do not have the fund... Post
u May 2 SuperBeast v No, it's not So you want healthcare? Get a job and pay for it like the rest of us. Post
Apr 30 Mr_me v I'm not sure I don't believe it is a fundamental right, but everyone should have a cost effective option. Healthcare insurance should be non profit. Post
Jan '13 ukuleleism v No, it's not Health care is not a fundamental right. Point to me where it says that in the Constitution, maybe I'll change my mind. Post
u Dec '12 RealHonesTruth v Yes, it is Republicans will try to say that it isn't, until one of them ends up in the hospital. If it is for them, then they feel it is a right, but they feel like no one deserves it but them. Just like how they don't want anyone to touch the money they get from the government, but they decry other people receiving money from the government. Post
u Dec '12 Chromalord v Yes, it is Of course it is. So is eating, clothing, shelter, voting, education, protection, representation, etc. Any civilized construct, concerned over the well-being and growth of its country, would be foolish to deny its citizens of those rights. OF course, if you are a GOP or a tea-party member, you publicly state you are against those as they fall under the evil auspices of socialism. It strikes me funny that a majority of the tea-party campaign's against the very things they themselves do not have or can afford. Maybe they make a good case for the right to public education, as they obviously forgot or did not comprehend what the original tea party was all about. r1 reply Post
u Dec '12 Chromalord I would also like to add that the topic of hand is health care, NOT health insurance. In the real world, here in the USA, by all accounts a very wealthy nation, there are over 45 million people who cannot afford health insurance, and most of them are denied health care or think they will be denied. Most don't even know that there are charities set into place, within the given hospital or clinic, all across the nation that will help them, if they qualify. Rich and poor become ill. But it seems some folks delicate feelings are hurt if a person gets sick but cannot afford to pay for treatment, that it is this person's moral obligation to earn enough money to take care o... Post @Chromalord
o Dec '12 vigilant v Yes, it is It is "a fundamental right" to the extent that forcing the health-care providers to "provide" it (under threat of deadly force), or to the extent forcing unrelated private citizens to pay (ten times) for it (under threat of deadly force) is acceptable. If you commander a free ride, somebody must pay for it. And if you force them to pay by a largely unpopular tax, then it is undeniably by threat of deadly force. It really is that simple. Post
Dec '12 Thunderchicken v No, it's not Health care is a service to be provided and purchased. B5 r32 replies e32 endorsed Post
Dec '12 Bobolinsky v No, it's not Nothing can be a "right" that obligates others. Call it a perk, entitlement, bene, or privilege... but if your "right" imposes a cost on others or otherwise obligates others to provide services for no pay... It's not a right. B3 r4 replies e30 endorsed Post
Dec '12 Dan_Tien v Yes, it is The Constitution says that we have a right to life. The US spends billions every year on defense professedly to protect the lives of Americans. One would hope that the government would move quickly to treat citizens in the event of a terrorist biological attack, without screening us all first for our health insurance status. We pay taxes to support police and fire departments to protect our lives. Can we then justify telling citizens that they have no right to healthcare in the event of a natural epidemic or in cases of individual illness? Is it fair and moral to hold the lives and health of American citizens hostage to profit? Not in my opinion. B3 r15 replies e27 endorsed Post
Dec '12 twinertia v Yes, it is It certainly should be. It's a common concern that binds all of humanity (unless you're some sort of a spiteful troll). A healthy populace is a productive populace. B2 e18 endorsed Post
Dec '12 Vermonter v No, it's not In order to get that health care we need somebody to provide it. Since when do we have the "right" to someone else's labors? That was called slavery. B4 e10 endorsed Post
u Dec '12 S-N-A-F-U v No, it's not Of course not! This nation was established for a free people to be able to obtain security and happyness from their OWN efforts and hard work....... "The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself." - Benjamin Franklin Get it??? B1 r2 replies e6 endorsed Post
Dec '12 LGRepublican @Cheenoguy So people should be able to be as irresponsible as they want and have absolutely no accountability for their own actions knowing full well that "the rest of us" will pick up the tab for any health problems they have as a result of poor decisions and behaviors? B6 Post @LGRepublican
Dec '12 jessejaymes v Yes, it is This is a misleading poll. This nation has already determined that health care is a fundamental right by including medicare with social security and medicaid for welfare. This latest "war" is only about whether working class poor, who are working and contributing, are entitled to affordable health care. Yes. B6 r3 replies Post
Dec '12 DARSB v Yes, it is While there are sure to be some voices denying the right to healthcare for financial reasons (as if they can assign a monetary value to a sick child's life) the larger issue is what sort of country to we want to be? I prefer one in which we look out for one another. e6 endorsed Post
o Dec '12 Cool_voter v Yes, it is In a so called Christian nation, there sure are alot of people who are very much against helping others... That seems wrong. If a business takes advantage of a tax break for rich, he is ok, but a poor person gets money for food, and woah, everyone freaks out. When Jesus gave the bread and fish did he charge them money, did he ask to sign a contract... No. If this is a Christian nation we Gould act as such. Other wise all the republicans should stop calling it a Christian nation... r6 replies e2 endorsed Post