Tue DrFunkenstein v Yes, ban 10+ bullet magazines There is no reason to have a bigger magazine unless you plan on murdering a lot of people and don't want to reload. Post
Jun 15 Greggmcneill v Yes, ban 10+ bullet magazines If you need 10 rounds to get your deer, you are a bad shot. Post
Jun 14 east2west v No, absolutely not if they do acheive that, then only criminals and the govt would have access. and they already do. so its just screwing the regular citizens. Post
o Jun 13 NoAmnestyEVER v No, absolutely not Banning high capacity magazines is just another one of Barack Obama's methods of taking away Constitutional guaranteed rights of American citizens, and thwarting the inevitable rebellion against his Communist plans to destroy America if his criminal actions persist. Post
Jun 11 JesusLivesInMe v No, absolutely not That would be an infringement on the Second Amendment. It wouldn't solve anything. The only thing it will do is keep them out of the hands of the law abiding citizens. Criminals don't obey the laws we have now they won't obey any new ones. I suppose we should ban all knives, and especially serrated ones because they're "assault knives". Oh and while we're at it lets ban ANYTHING that can be used to make bombs with. Sorry mom, can't make anything in our pressure cooker tonight because it's being banned. Let's ban all tools such as hammers, wrenches, and especially nails because they can be used in bombs to cause more harm (recall Boston anyone?). Let's ban ANYTHING that... Post
Jun 11 Crazycon312 v No, absolutely not If I have to limit my rounds could you also pass a bill that anyone who owns a hammer must keep it bubble wrapped at all times because I would feel safe knowing someone could smash my skull in... Thanks B1 Post
Tue DrFunkenstein v Yes, ban 10+ bullet magazines There is no reason to have a bigger magazine unless you plan on murdering a lot of people and don't want to reload. Post
Jun 15 Greggmcneill v Yes, ban 10+ bullet magazines If you need 10 rounds to get your deer, you are a bad shot. Post
Jun 14 east2west v No, absolutely not if they do acheive that, then only criminals and the govt would have access. and they already do. so its just screwing the regular citizens. Post
o Jun 13 NoAmnestyEVER v No, absolutely not Banning high capacity magazines is just another one of Barack Obama's methods of taking away Constitutional guaranteed rights of American citizens, and thwarting the inevitable rebellion against his Communist plans to destroy America if his criminal actions persist. Post
Jun 11 JesusLivesInMe v No, absolutely not That would be an infringement on the Second Amendment. It wouldn't solve anything. The only thing it will do is keep them out of the hands of the law abiding citizens. Criminals don't obey the laws we have now they won't obey any new ones. I suppose we should ban all knives, and especially serrated ones because they're "assault knives". Oh and while we're at it lets ban ANYTHING that can be used to make bombs with. Sorry mom, can't make anything in our pressure cooker tonight because it's being banned. Let's ban all tools such as hammers, wrenches, and especially nails because they can be used in bombs to cause more harm (recall Boston anyone?). Let's ban ANYTHING that... Post
Jun 11 Crazycon312 v No, absolutely not If I have to limit my rounds could you also pass a bill that anyone who owns a hammer must keep it bubble wrapped at all times because I would feel safe knowing someone could smash my skull in... Thanks B1 Post
May 29 11Bravo20 v No, absolutely not No "Compromise" on ANY of our Rights. They are NOT a dispensation of Government! Post
May 29 GunPolitics v No, absolutely not Pointless for a number of reasons - most importantly it won't work and is therefore a waste of time and money Post
May 26 dethkat666 v Yes, ban 10+ bullet magazines If you think your 30 round+ magazines will defend you against a government with tanks, cruise missiles and armed drones you are living in a fantasy world where the "good guys" never miss and the "bad guys" never hit. You must think life is like the "A-Team" r3 replies Post
May 29 GunPolitics Not really the point - do we really need more feel good legislation which will have no real impact on crime? B1 @GunPolitics Post
Jun 11 Crazycon312 Do you think if theirs a ban on magazine size the criminals will listen to that? Half of them illegally own guns as it is. When something becomes illegal it goes on the black market. It will be a failure just like the war on drugs. B1 @Crazycon312 Post
o Jun 13 NoAmnestyEVER The Taliban didn't have tanks, cruise missiles or armed drones, and they kicked our asses, and Russia's too. It's just a matter of will. And the good guys are the enemies of Obama. @NoAmnestyEVER Post
u May 26 RealTexan v Yes, ban 10+ bullet magazines Actually, the ban should be stronger then the options presented here. Post
May 22 JohnVicky v Yes, ban 10+ bullet magazines Of course they should...... but they won't be. In my home state you can't hunt big game with a gun that has more than 5 round capacity magazine. If you can't hit something in 5 rounds, you might be .........a Republican. r1 reply Post
u May 22 bajo v Yes, ban 10+ bullet magazines I'm an an awesome shot... i will never need that amount of ammo to a target or a deer. Post
u May 20 PWM v No, absolutely not Tongue in cheek here, I believe we need to make safer guns and safer bullets. This is the statement of Dr. Joycelyn Elders, Attorney General of the USA under Bill Clinton. You may also remember her suggestion that bucket makers put holes in their buckets so that toddlers could not drown if they accidentally fell in. To be serious for a moment, I can take a revolver and with a number of speed loaders, sustain a fairly significant rate of fire. This drive to reduce magazine capacity is an incremental move to set legal precedent allowing a more progressive Supreme Court to gut the Second Amendment. And don't think it will stop there. If these gun grabbers erode the ... B2 r1 reply Post
May 29 GunPolitics And as quick as speed loaders are moon clips are just as fast as mag changes @GunPolitics Post
May '13 mwr v No, absolutely not this action is a faults concept that will not impact the mentally ill folks who shoot at groups of people. Post
May '13 Seanwongng v No, absolutely not To stop heroin addicts lets limit the syringe sizes... Not to mention that people can now print hi cap mags with 3d printers, so if a criminal really wants something they will get it. The government is punishing the wrong people... Post
May '13 Jaybird1964 v No, absolutely not The only control a ban puts in place is on law abiding citizens...criminals will get what they want from somewhere and we should be able to defend ourselves from the government or criminals!!! Post
May '13 Ashley_Steele v No, absolutely not If they can limit this, what other freedom can they take away? B1 Post
o May '13 earl v No, absolutely not The Second Amendment does not mention high-capacity magazines. Post
Jan '13 AlexMIA v No, absolutely not This is just more government infringement on second amendment rights. It will do nothing to make people safer. The market will still have them just at a higher price. Bad guys can still carry multiple 10 round clips and reload fairly quick. Screwing with law abiding citizens will not make one bit of difference. B4 e94 endorsed Post
Jan '13 RedFloppyShoes v No, absolutely not Banning high capacity magazines has nothing to do with the crime level. Truth is, I can reload my gun in 2 seconds. Most people who are skilled in weaponry can do the same. Of course by me saying that, the next thing they will ban is how many magazines you can own. e21 endorsed Post
Jan '13 stepped_in_it v Yes, ban 10+ bullet magazines Want versus need.....And what exactly is a high cap mag used for? Besides that! r28 replies e21 endorsed Post
Jan '13 falco_alba v Yes, ban 10+ bullet magazines It only takes one bullet to protect yourself and if you are a responsible gun owner, you are capable of aim. B2 r31 replies e10 endorsed Post
Jan '13 PoliticalSpice v No, absolutely not Actually, all this talk about thd second amendment for protection against crime or hunting is nonsense. Not saying firearms should not be used for that purpose, but the stated purpose of the second amendment is for the arming of militia. It is militia type weapons that are meant to be protected, and high capacity clips, in my opinion, fall directly into that catagory. That is something the states, which are specifically specified as the entities to arms militia should be in charge of regulating. B1 e10 endorsed Post
u Jan '13 Oneness3am_i v Yes, ban 10+ bullet magazines Right along with assault Rifels B1 r2 replies e8 endorsed Post
u Jan '13 Grubby v No, absolutely not This will not make people safer. It is a liberal city-folk democrat feel-good move. They wouldn't know a magazine if they saw one, it just sounds better to have a smaller number, as if that will make a difference. It takes me maybe 2 seconds to switch out a magazine. If I wanted to do harm to someone it would be a minor inconvenience to carry 10 magazines in a bag instead of maybe 4 or 5. Don't worry Liberals, I am not advocating harming people, but this has nothing to do with safety. It will have no effect. Of course, the idiot liberals are also talking about banning handguards and adjustable stocks, both of which make guns SAFER, not more dangerous. Clueless morons. B1 e6 endorsed Post
Jan '13 AMSCountryboy v No, absolutely not Ok first of all it takes about ONE (1) second to change a magazine....so whats the difference? Why is it anybodys business how many rounds are in my weapon that i have the right to have anyway? Even if making these magazines illegal would do somthing to stop gun violence (it wont) do you really expect criminals to follow ANY gun law? e4 endorsed Post
Jan '13 SavageMazx v No, absolutely not Banning magazines won't solve the problem and directly infringes on my rights. e3 endorsed Post