u Sat seedtick v No, waste of money Enough of our money has been wasted on Barack Husssein Obama's pie-in-the-sky environmental schemes. Now, if we can develop reasonable alternative energy sources in a reasonable way without stealing taxpayer dollars and funneling them to cronies then, by all means, do so. Post
May 14 NoAmnestyEVER v No, waste of money There are tons of untapped oil in the United States ready to go. So much that we could get off of foreign dependence and fix the deficit problem in one shot, instead of bailing out all the failed Solyndras for billions of wasted taxpayer dollars. Post
May 13 MongoAPillager v No, waste of money the government has no constitutional business getting involved in any ventures such as this..tenth amendment for example,,business ventures are for the private sector only Post
May 11 Bill2E v No, waste of money Ge the government out of the energy business and let private industry work on green energy, if there is a buck to be made on it some company will pick up the research and development. It will be expensive at first but it won't have the government overspending n it. Post
u May 9 gherlone v Yes, great idea! as long as it is invested in true research, not subsidizing select, politically connected companies. Mr. Obama's crony capitalism is embarrassing, and smears mud on legitimate efforts to develop alternate energy technologies. Post
u Apr 30 fraps v No, waste of money Venture capitalists know how to invest. Politicians only know how to get pork and make everything more expensive. Post
Apr 29 marine1 v No, waste of money The goverment should invest in paying off the f&&&&&g debt and bringing jobs back to this country. Post
u Sat seedtick v No, waste of money Enough of our money has been wasted on Barack Husssein Obama's pie-in-the-sky environmental schemes. Now, if we can develop reasonable alternative energy sources in a reasonable way without stealing taxpayer dollars and funneling them to cronies then, by all means, do so. Post
May 14 NoAmnestyEVER v No, waste of money There are tons of untapped oil in the United States ready to go. So much that we could get off of foreign dependence and fix the deficit problem in one shot, instead of bailing out all the failed Solyndras for billions of wasted taxpayer dollars. Post
May 13 MongoAPillager v No, waste of money the government has no constitutional business getting involved in any ventures such as this..tenth amendment for example,,business ventures are for the private sector only Post
May 11 Bill2E v No, waste of money Ge the government out of the energy business and let private industry work on green energy, if there is a buck to be made on it some company will pick up the research and development. It will be expensive at first but it won't have the government overspending n it. Post
u May 9 gherlone v Yes, great idea! as long as it is invested in true research, not subsidizing select, politically connected companies. Mr. Obama's crony capitalism is embarrassing, and smears mud on legitimate efforts to develop alternate energy technologies. Post
u Apr 30 fraps v No, waste of money Venture capitalists know how to invest. Politicians only know how to get pork and make everything more expensive. Post
Apr 29 marine1 v No, waste of money The goverment should invest in paying off the f&&&&&g debt and bringing jobs back to this country. Post
Feb '13 jmiller94 v No, waste of money Why is the Amerikan government investing in any technology comrade? Are they venture capitalist now? B1 Post
u Feb '13 ashgreen v Yes, great idea! It's in our country's best interest to switch to green technology as fast as possible: 1. While expensive upfront, it saves money in the long-run meaning we will be ahead of the curve while waiting for others to catch up (economically beneficial). 2. We will no longer be reliant on foreign providers, and they will therefore not hold such huge bargaining power over our heads. 3. Foreign events will no longer threaten our energy provisions--as long as the sun is shining and the wind is blowing, we'll have energy. I really don't see any downside to this. Green energy will easily pay for itself in several decades in both time, energy, and natural resources--I don't see... r4 replies Post
u Feb '13 cnw95 I keep thinking about GM and their EV1. Here was a green product that had demand and did NOT need gov subsidies. And this was during the time of the big SUV boom and their was intrest in an electric car. GM sold out to all the supporters of oil and flushed the EV1 down the toilet and look what happened 10 years later...oil goes through the roof and SUV sales went down like a kamikaze pilot. Bet GM wished they hadn't scrapped that EV1. What a waste. Post @cnw95
u Feb '13 ashgreen @cnw95 Did you see "Who Killed the Electric Car"? It was a pretty good little documentary (although I saw it on a date, pretty much the most boring date I've ever been on). Post @ashgreen
u Feb '13 cnw95 @ashgreen Yep, i saw it. An eye opening movie. Really makes you question the motives of the biggest players in our "free market" system. (Although i've never seen "who killed the electric car" as a 1st date flick...maybe "along came polly"...pretty good "non-political" flick.) Post @cnw95
u Feb '13 ashgreen @cnw95 Yeah, I was kind of hoping he'd take me to see Pirates of the Caribbean 2. No such luck. Let's just say I didn't date him for too long... As much as I'm very libertarian, hands-off in my politics and I don't usually agree with the government getting involved in the economy, I do think that something needs to be done about companies who completely disregard the way their industry affects the environment. It's all about the bottom line, but I think in recent years there's been a big push for more transparency and a move towards more natural production. At the same time, there's a kid driving a hummer to my sister's high school. I have only met one person ... Post @ashgreen
Feb '13 Jamesa1019 v No, waste of money I work full time in an industrial environment. I go to school for industrial technology. I cannot begin to tell u how "green" energy is neither "green" nor is it a good field to seek employment. I see many young kids going for wind energy. Only to not find employment upon graduation. Green energy will not break our ties to foreign energy sources, or help aid our failing economy and plummeting employment rate. I also note that there has been many failed movements that have soaked up millions if not billions of our country's money. Good thought at heart, but NOT practical at this time! r1 reply Post
u Feb '13 ashgreen Will it be practical when our children don't have any clean air to breathe, clean water to swim in, or forests to play in? Something has to give, and it's either going to be we adapt and change, or we will destroy ourselves. It's not practical *now*, but what about for your great-grand children? Or their great-grandchildren? Post @ashgreen
Jan '13 ukuleleism v No, waste of money The government should stop investing in anything for the next 15 years or so so they can get all the money they lost with the Bush and Obama Administration back. Post
Jan '13 Middle0road v Yes, great idea! We need to invest in all opportunities that extend or even sustain our finite resources for fuel. Post
Jan '13 cat2009 v No, waste of money At this time because all of the green energy investments have taken the money run Either we find companies credible or find someone in gov. that knows what they are doing. Post
u Jan '13 Yank v Yes, great idea! As long as you add "smartly" before invest. Why not create a green tech version of NASA or DARPA? Post
Jan '13 jessejaymes v Yes, great idea! Providing they invest in proven technology. Many places in Europe are doing great things with proven wind technology. There is no need for more Solyandra's. Post
u Jan '13 S-N-A-F-U v No, waste of money Hasn't this Amateur wasted enough of our OUR money on hair-brained schemes, that he and his affiliates have no expertise in? He obviously has to much 'green-mold' in his cabeza..... B1 r2 replies Post
Jan '13 harold_lloyd I'm so sorry to have to inform you that not everything you don't like about the universe is Obama's fault. The fifteen or twenty minutes it took you to compose and then type that little diatribe could have been better spent trying to figure out why the govt supporting new technology is a good thing. Post @harold_lloyd
u Jan '13 S-N-A-F-U @harold_lloyd When one engages in insipid sophistry he should apologize. I didn't paint the 'Amateur' with a broad brush, he can't help what he is, but he is responsible for what he does. He has engaged in things that's obviously over his head -- when he should be paying attention to our out of control spending and debt of over 16.5 TRILLION DOLLARS, with over 4 BILLION being added each and every day, which I might add, he has totally ignored.....Wise-up! And Green Energy is not his Forte, especially with other peoples money we haven't got...... The complete list of faltering or bankrupt green-energy companies, many of which received govt. assistance ..... ... Post @S-N-A-F-U
Jan '13 ir0nw0lfe v I'm not sure investing in green technology is essential for the future of the country. continuing to invest poorly with our tax money , no educated decision makers, and no oversight, is a recipe for financial disaster it is financially irresponsible to force the Navy to buy algae grown fuelwhen traditional fossil fuels are available at a fraction of the cost . the country is not currently in the financial state to ignore cheap sources of energy in exchange for future promises by untested technologies. let's get country on stable financially putting then talk about how much research we can pour into green technologies . why are we so desperate to be the leading bankrupt country in t... B1 Post
Jan '13 blue_yahoo v No, waste of money The government is the least efficient agency to have invest in anything. Green technology needs to be kept in the private sector where business belongs. B1 e43 endorsed Post
Jan '13 Russell797 v Yes, great idea! Renewable energy sources are the future, whether you agree the government should invest in it or not. The quicker we integrate clean, renewable energies into the mix the further we will be towards energy independence, safeguarded against peak oil, a cleaner environment and most important of all, slowing the growth in atmospheric and oceanic CO2. Large scale deployment of clean, renewable energies and a new, smart electrical grid would provide a boom to the economy similar to what we experienced following World War II. e18 endorsed Post
Jan '13 twinertia v Yes, great idea! Oil ain't gonna last forever, folks. The sun shines all the time, the wind blows all the time, rain's gonna fall all the time. If you don't face up to those realities, you're gonna be beating your swords into plowshares eventually. B2 r2 replies e7 endorsed Post
Jan '13 MarkJM v No, waste of money The last time we "invested" in green tech, we got the "stimulus", which was a colossal failure. A lot of that money went to green tech alright, in China. I say no, let the free market work on this. No subsidies for them (and in fairness no subsidies for big oil either). It's called Capitalism. The people will invest/buy into green tech if they so choose to. B2 e6 endorsed Post
u Jan '13 Raptor v Yes, great idea! If you don't, your children will pay the price. Ask yourself, are they worth it? But the greedy right wing republicans think think only of themself's and they do care for the future or your children. B2 e2 endorsed Post
Jan '13 Tralee v No, waste of money Government has proven that they are not good businessmen, let the private sector do the research and development, the public need and desire for green energy will drive the market. We really don't need to waste anymore money on more Solyndra's, we don't have it to waste. e3 endorsed Post
Jan '13 Roco v I'm not sure Going green would be a good thing. But the typical Washington way of pork spending needs to be eliminated. Putting something in a area because it would generate income for some lobbyist's partners is not the way to go. Like fast speed rail. Don't just put it down the East coast. Research it to find the optimal place for it. Stop backing certain panels because some company made a huge donation to a candidate. Stop making regulations against some green techs to make it harder for the consumer to invest in it. Just make it affordable. How many people can afford this green "luxury cars?" e3 endorsed Post
Jan '13 gammler v Yes, great idea! The plain fact of the matter is that the price of oil based products will not drop to reasonable levels until oil has competition. That's economics 101. At the present time NONE of the alternative sources of energy are as efficient as oil is in producing energy at a reasonable cost. Until they are the oil companies will charge what the traffic will bear. That's why I think investment in research in "green energy" is a good idea. B1 e1 endorsed Post
Jan '13 Locutus v Yes, great idea! It would save money in the long run by not sending our money out of the country. There are many ways that have been stiffled to help out the lumber, oil and money industries. If we don't start to become self sufficient now it will only get worse as we go. We have become such a lazy, blame everyone else country that we can't see our own faults. It goes back to pride in our work and from what I can see there is not much anymore. Look at the new plane that was grounded because of the battery, the lawsuits from giving our children all the medical poisons to help them. We have plenty of work here to help the people and the country but we are too busy arguing to get anything... B1 e1 endorsed Post