Comments (view in Forum)

  • !
    Exactly.. Russia's is like 10 or something like that. Plus- if our economy shrinks, so will revenue generated through taxation causing an even worse debt crisis. Liable to be paid in the future by young people like myself.
  • !
    So you think raising taxes by a few billion a year is going to have a major impact on the cuts? Our deficit is more the the total of all income taxes paid in the US. Our yearly dept interest alone eats up almost half of our income taxes.

    P.S. I wonder who was the one person who voted no.
  • !
    @Yank It's not about raising taxes....it's about raising jobs....get jobs back and you'll get the revenue back....as long as jobs are still scarce there won't be the required revenue needed....and cuts are the only way....
  • !
    @Yank Nope, never said that. My plan would be as follows:

    1) Cut $400 billion from the military budget
    2) Use that $400 billion and invest it in a coast to coast rail system, a federal bio diesel program, and bridge/road/sewer/water/electr icity/gas infrastructure projects, targeting people currently out of work. Get UE under 5%
    3) Raise ALL taxes back to Clinton levels

    In one year you have a balanced budget and a roaring economy.
  • !
    @AceLuby first of all we already have a coast to coast rail system (multiple ones). Second of all you are still talking a fraction of our deficit. Also moving spending around will not create a net impact. Lastly how much will going back to Clinton Era taxes increase revenue? You are still talking about needing to cut a trillion dollars.
  • !
    @AceLuby The last thing you want is a federally owned rail system...check out AMTRACK. If you want better rail systems you need to give tax incentives to the railroad companies so they will rebuild the present system. It's all about right of ways and you can't buy that overnight. What do you want to do? Nationalize the rail system? Won't work.
    Then where will the rest of the money come from? And how many generations will be working on this?
  • View all 16 replies >

  • !
    @Neo_NtheMatrix

    who 'gutted' the military? they just cut spending, as needed. any cuts to any gov't dept will mean decreased spending in the private sectors that provide for that dept...

    seems another core value of less gov't has fallen....
  • !
    @woodtick57 Lets see we've cut the Raptor program, cutting edge weapons, intelligence programs, our enemies are either stealing current tech and we're GIVING F-16s and tanks to Egypt rather than selling....and an Egypt that is more close to terrorists than ever before....
  • View all 7 replies >

  • !
    @AceLuby Exactly. Coupled with increased spending recently, you have an economic dip when you try to return to previous levels.
  • !
    @Hireman In what world have we increased spending recently? We haven't had new spending since the stimulus.$400 billion of the current deficit is due to less people paying in and more people taking out due to the recession and nearly $600 billion was left over from the previous administration. If spending has been 'way too high' it has been that way since Reagan, yet it has only been since Obama has taken office that it has been an issue... actually that's not true, the same thing happened when Clinton was in office too. When the GOP control the WH "deficits don't matter".
  • !
    @AceLuby why do you keep trying to make this partison? Bush was one of the worst presidents ever, so why would you defend Obama doing what he did? Also not having new spending is not the issue. Spending greatly increased and then has kept at those levels.
  • !
    @AceLuby Rampant government spending has been an issue long before Obama. I'm not sure why this has somehow become a Rep vs Dem thing in your eyes.
  • View all 27 replies >

  • !
    the best is yet to come, the government is about to add millions of mexicans to the welfare rolls.Dependency weakens character but strengthens Government.
  • !
    Doesn't surprise me. The recession was never over. The Obama Administration juggled the numbers, and the media dutifully reported it that way, to get Obama and his fellow Democrats re-elected.
  • !
    Economists have been warning of a coming recession for both Europe and the US for months. How can a predicted recession be 'unexpected'? Only if certain people turned a deaf ear to the truth.
  • !
    Take the money from the military? What about shedding all that pork that gets added to bills that has nothing to do with it. I would bet that would accomplish more than de-funding our military. What about the raises congress just gave themselves?! Take that away! They make plenty of money for not doing much. Their not even on session a lot of the time! Quit giving billions to Pakastan! They are not up holding their end of the deal. If our country does not have enoug money at home, why are we giving so much to other countries!? I named Pakastan because I know we are giving them billions upon billions! The military is needed. Just not in Iraq or Afghanistan anymore. All out now!!!! We're already getting involved in Mali. Cut the pork, take away those raises, cut off Pakastan! Then see what our country's economy looks like. If it's not enough, cut off the other countries we're giving money to. Cut all that out!! At this time, the only thing the hill needs to think about is helping our own citizens, not hurting them worse! They are more concerned about other countries than our own. It's time to stop!!!
  • !
    We're on the Titanic with Hussein at the helm and he has the crew rearranging the deck chairs. Stockpile while you can, folks!
  • R Load more comments...