Jun 8 PJS1973 v No, bad move After our economy, infrastructure, schools, healthcare, prison system, military, and 20 other things that are higher priority than this fancy are addressed, and we still have a surplus of money, sure. Post
u Jun 6 LaLuz v No, bad move We should wait til the illegals get their amnesty. Then our Castro/Chavez style dictatorshipship can use the wifi to consolidate their power and control over the american people. Post
Jun 5 Randolf v No, bad move Sure why not??? Free house, free food, free money, free obamaphn, reduced utility bills... Why not free wifi? These poor souls have nothing else to do besides wait for first of the month to come how bout lettin them surf the net:) Post
u Jun 4 Avoicenmany v No, bad move Good gawd!! I am about as a techno geek as they come, my first computer was a Commodore PET. This is so bad is so many ways to even mention, Govt. sponsored WiFi, yeah just a nice way to track movement, and collect data for the NSA to mine. I have SBC and my plan already has nationwide hotspots, and if I really needed more I just get a cellular dongle for my laptops or tablet. No Government involvement in the internet PERIOD... Well except Al Gore "I invented the internet" was involved LMAO, I think Vint Serf would disagree :) Post
u Jun 2 Libertyboy v No, bad move If they can really find a way to make it free, sure. If it won't cost anybody, not consumers or taxpayers, a dime. But that's impossible. Post
May 27 wde01 v Yes, I'm all for it! Yes! Free the internet! One of the best things ever invented. Post
May 26 JumpRoundhouse v Yes, I'm all for it! Anymore a great number of jobs require you to apply online only. Since this is the case I feel it's only right for there to be free Internet access Post
o May 23 NoAmnestyEVER v No, bad move What kind of effect do these WiFi signals have on the human body? We already know that cell phones are causing brain cancer. WiFi offers the easiest access of computer hackers. Isn't there enough identity theft already? And when the government says FREE, it's never really free, it's taxpayer funded. Post
May 20 Hoosierdaddy v No, bad move In places where it is justifiable not everywhere like where population densities are forbiddingly low Post
Jun 8 PJS1973 v No, bad move After our economy, infrastructure, schools, healthcare, prison system, military, and 20 other things that are higher priority than this fancy are addressed, and we still have a surplus of money, sure. Post
u Jun 6 LaLuz v No, bad move We should wait til the illegals get their amnesty. Then our Castro/Chavez style dictatorshipship can use the wifi to consolidate their power and control over the american people. Post
Jun 5 Randolf v No, bad move Sure why not??? Free house, free food, free money, free obamaphn, reduced utility bills... Why not free wifi? These poor souls have nothing else to do besides wait for first of the month to come how bout lettin them surf the net:) Post
u Jun 4 Avoicenmany v No, bad move Good gawd!! I am about as a techno geek as they come, my first computer was a Commodore PET. This is so bad is so many ways to even mention, Govt. sponsored WiFi, yeah just a nice way to track movement, and collect data for the NSA to mine. I have SBC and my plan already has nationwide hotspots, and if I really needed more I just get a cellular dongle for my laptops or tablet. No Government involvement in the internet PERIOD... Well except Al Gore "I invented the internet" was involved LMAO, I think Vint Serf would disagree :) Post
u Jun 2 Libertyboy v No, bad move If they can really find a way to make it free, sure. If it won't cost anybody, not consumers or taxpayers, a dime. But that's impossible. Post
May 27 wde01 v Yes, I'm all for it! Yes! Free the internet! One of the best things ever invented. Post
May 26 JumpRoundhouse v Yes, I'm all for it! Anymore a great number of jobs require you to apply online only. Since this is the case I feel it's only right for there to be free Internet access Post
o May 23 NoAmnestyEVER v No, bad move What kind of effect do these WiFi signals have on the human body? We already know that cell phones are causing brain cancer. WiFi offers the easiest access of computer hackers. Isn't there enough identity theft already? And when the government says FREE, it's never really free, it's taxpayer funded. Post
May 20 Hoosierdaddy v No, bad move In places where it is justifiable not everywhere like where population densities are forbiddingly low Post
May 20 jessejaymes v Yes, I'm all for it! My first thought was the government will use a govt supplied wi fi as a tool to spy on citizens. My second thought is so what? They already do. Why not have free wi fi? r1 reply Post
May 30 NOObama As If Its a big deal. Maybe Government could spend more time in straightening out the economy than worrying about WiFi @NOObama Post
o May 20 Goose v No, bad move Politix can furnish free WiFi to everyone, since one of its editors apparently believes the money to pay for this is no big deal. Post
May '13 DARSB v Yes, I'm all for it! Libraries are free, Wi-Fi could be reasonably compared to that. B1 r3 replies Post
May 20 jessejaymes Actually this is a very relevant point. I went into a library about two years ago, in a city of half a million to try look up something local I couldn't find on the internet. That monster library was damn near empty. About 20 workers and about 5 civilians using the library. I was amazed. The Wi fi may well be our new library because the old ones certainly aren't cost effective today if what I saw was representative. B1 @jessejaymes Post
o May 23 NoAmnestyEVER But that would disenfranchise all the illegal aliens who can't read and poor Obama voters people who don't have computers. @NoAmnestyEVER Post
o May 23 NoAmnestyEVER By the way, libraries aren't free, nothing is. It's all TAXPAYER FUNDED. @NoAmnestyEVER Post
May '13 outsidecat v No, bad move don't we have more crippling issues to spend money on instead of a luxury such as internet sounds like another way they want you to be dependent upon them also there is major privacy concerns there too as they would be able to monitor everything you do Post
May '13 Bob72370 v No, bad move Why should the government be in the WiFi business, or the Healthcare business? Should the government be our provider for everything? Under the present administration they can't collect taxes without breaking the law, they can't provide protection to our embassies , they can't or wont even provide meals to our troops in the field. Post
Feb '13 stepped_in_it v No, bad move Nothing in life is free. Let me repeat .....NOTHING in life is FREE. Has anything....anything the government "offered" free been "free". My Mom once told me....."Son, if it's too good to be true, it's TOO GOOD to be TRUE". How right she was! B3 r1 reply e62 endorsed Post
Feb '13 DrFunkenstein v Yes, I'm all for it! The United States in 2002 was number one in the world in connectivity and speed. Now we are 12th in the world and we pay more than the other countries. In South Korea they have 200 times the speed and pay 40% less than the United States. The FCC has for years told the Cable and DSL providers to upgrade their lines or lower their high fees, they have not done either. They are being paid incredibly high fees each month for little or no effort, it's just a pipeline they paid for years ago and they allow you access to it. Free Wifi will force them to either upgrade or die. It's a disgrace that someone in Sweden can access an American server at a higher connection speed tha... B3 r2 replies e41 endorsed Post
Feb '13 gammler v No, bad move If the government controls it, they will assert the right to censure it. "A government that is big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have away". (Gerald Ford) e35 endorsed Post
u Feb '13 AceLuby v I'm not sure I would have to know some details before I could vote either way. How would it be implemented? How fast would it be? How much will it cost? They tried to do it cheaply in my city and it's an awful implementation, so I'd have to hear some specifics. e6 endorsed Post
Feb '13 blue_yahoo v No, bad move How can the government offer free WiFi when their only source of income is from the people using the "free" WiFi. Oxymoron here. B5 r2 replies e1 endorsed Post
Feb '13 chiilgod v Yes, I'm all for it! Japan's average Internet access is 500 Mbp. US average Internet access is 2.5 Mbp. (Support THE VENUS PROJECT) B2 r2 replies e2 endorsed Post
u Feb '13 seedtick v Yes, I'm all for it! This is an interesting thing that could be very helpful. But, we must also remember that this cannot become the only WiFi available...because once it is our wireless access to the internet will be controlled by the government. And careful steps must be taken to make sure that this does not become our only access to the internet. B1 e3 endorsed Post
Feb '13 tomhorn1903 v No, bad move I am sure all the 'low information' voters and ObamaPhone recipients will swoon over the prospects of getting 'free' Wi-Fi. If the government provides it they also control its use. Horrible idea. It also begs the question,"Who is paying for it?" e3 endorsed Post
Feb '13 WMCOL v No, bad move Would certainly give the police state another means of surveilling individuals across the nation. "Person of Interest" anyone? B1 r6 replies e2 endorsed Post