Mon razrbackrepub v I can see both sides It wasn't right at all what happened to the native Americans. It is a dark period in America's history. I have Scottish and Cherokee ancestry. Both are proud and humble people. Either way they were almost wiped out by English. Post
Mon Greggmcneill v Yes, they were Europeans stole this land from the Native Americans who were here over 10,000 years earlier. Post
Jun 16 1971tennessee v No, of course not How can you be an illegal alien in a country that does not exist yet? Post
Jun 14 wangotango v No, of course not Theres no comparison between the pilgrims and the law breaking illegal aliens. There wasnt any laws at that time. Now there is and illegals have ruined certain types of businesses and damn sure shouldnt be given any rights afforded to a US citizen. They are lawbreakers and should be treated as such. Post
Jun 6 jeffreyknee v No, of course not The natives also took lands from each other over centuries. Post
May 26 Thegrif v No, of course not No, there was no law, and no America, so how could they be illegal anything. Post
Mon razrbackrepub v I can see both sides It wasn't right at all what happened to the native Americans. It is a dark period in America's history. I have Scottish and Cherokee ancestry. Both are proud and humble people. Either way they were almost wiped out by English. Post
Mon Greggmcneill v Yes, they were Europeans stole this land from the Native Americans who were here over 10,000 years earlier. Post
Jun 16 1971tennessee v No, of course not How can you be an illegal alien in a country that does not exist yet? Post
Jun 14 wangotango v No, of course not Theres no comparison between the pilgrims and the law breaking illegal aliens. There wasnt any laws at that time. Now there is and illegals have ruined certain types of businesses and damn sure shouldnt be given any rights afforded to a US citizen. They are lawbreakers and should be treated as such. Post
Jun 6 jeffreyknee v No, of course not The natives also took lands from each other over centuries. Post
May 26 Thegrif v No, of course not No, there was no law, and no America, so how could they be illegal anything. Post
May 25 DogLady_1 v No, of course not Pilgrims invaded and wiped out peaceful communities and tribes of people... But the natives of this continent do not believe that anyone owns the earth. It belongs to everyone, and we can't take it with us when we die. What the Indians didn't expect is for the pilgrims to not understand the concept of sharing the land and being a good steward of natural resources and living peacefully with other human beings. In other words, pilgrims were more like termites, than immigrants... Invasive, destructive pests who only cared about what they wanted, and cared nothing about who/what they had to annihilate to get it. B1 Post
May 21 FreelancerFl v I can see both sides Consider the following, there was no defined nation at the time, and the Indian tribes didn't have the same definition of land ownership as the Europeans. So, if the Indians did share the same definition of land ownership they could be considered illegal immigrants because they took land from the Indians, sometimes by force. Post
May 19 mikev9359 v Yes, they were Technically, yes. But at that time there were no set government to dictate law in this hemisphere as there was in Europe and Asia. Once the people who migrated here banded together and formed a government with laws, then it became an issue for those coming within those territories. Post
u May 19 fayban v No, of course not Of course not. We were conqueros then and still are whats the problem. This is our country won by war. All immigrants here currently should feel privileged we allow them here. What country wasn't built by war? r1 reply Post
u May '13 Gatnos v No, of course not This is an example of the trash that is being taught in schools these days. It is part of the "Common Core" curriculum. In order for an activity to be illegal, there must be a law against that activity. No immigration laws existed at the time of the pilgrims. r4 replies Post
May 21 FreelancerFl Actually, if the Indians viewed land ownership in the way the Europeans did, they would be considered illegal immigrants. @FreelancerFl Post
May 22 FreelancerFl @Gatnos Since there were no immigration laws at the time there was no such thing as illegal immigration. @FreelancerFl Post
u May '13 HawkTheSlayer v No, of course not And the forces that be are still trying, albeit for entirely different reasons. The afore mentioned groups all came here to have a better life, even the pilgrims, and sacrificed much to get here. They endured the hardships, era by era. The fight was an internal struggle with winners and losers from the inception of this nation through the struggles of cival war to modern day. This nation can resolve any problem or difference it has. That used to be my thinking until the '90's. The outside influence is strong. And getting stronger every day. Those who wish american success today do not have american values. Sadly, this includes many americans. Especially, those i... Post
May '13 MongoAPillager v No, of course not We came,We saw,We kicked Ass,GET OVER IT!!! Moral of the story,right or wrong,Don,t bring a stick to a gun fight!!! r3 replies Post
May 21 FreelancerFl Rather, bring a knife to a gun fight. Stab them in the throat while they're laughing. @FreelancerFl Post
u May '13 URBS v No, of course not Funny how this debate uses, "Illegal" while all the other ones use, "Undocumented". Post
May '13 PayThatCEO v No, of course not To have been "illegal" there would have had to be an immigration policy, which there wasn't. There would have had to be a country, which there wasn't. What the pilgrims (as well as those who came after them) was land owned by no one. Native Americans did not own the land. They had no deeds, no titles to anything. Legally, they owned nothing so nothing could be taken away. In their minds they might have thought they owned whatever land they sat on, but even tribes fought over ownership of land and once white men got to America they brought the rule of law with them. Post
May '13 Prime_Meridian v Yes, they were Yes. By legal definition. If the Native Americans didn't give them permission to come here and establish colonies, that alone makes them "illegal immigrants", but then, so were the Native Americans who first came here from across the Bering Straits, from the South Seas and from Europe. There WERE people living in the Americas way back then. Just like we had TINY HORSES here before they became extinct and the Spaniards imported European and Arabic varieties of horses. r1 reply Post
May '13 PayThatCEO No permission was needed. In the eyes of the law we believed in then and believe in now, Native Americans owned nothing in the way of land. @PayThatCEO Post
o May '13 Goose v No, of course not "Illegal" means against the law(s). Only civilized societies have those. Post
u May '13 DotsonB v Yes, they were Last time I checked they weren't citizens of The United States when they came here. Post
Feb '13 Thunderchicken v No, of course not How can an act be illegal if there is no law against it? B3 r12 replies e56 endorsed Post
Feb '13 Dan_Tien v Yes, they were ...and the Native Americans tribes either didn't have the sense or the power to make them leave. Some of them said "Live and let live. They are already here. Let them live among us as neighbors and equals. What could it hurt?" Then look what happened. r13 replies e25 endorsed Post
Feb '13 gammler v No, of course not What a ridiculous question! Using the same logic one could say the American Indians were illegal immigrants. They came from Asia. B1 e21 endorsed Post
Feb '13 spiritglove v No, of course not For the Pilgrims to be illegal immigrants there would have to be a law that defined any non-native as an immigrant and a system of immigration. the Native Americans believed the idea of owning land to be repugnant, they considered themselves part of the land. Pilgrams can be considered settlers, or invaders even but illegal immigrant status would require a body of laws that did not exist at the time. What a stupid controversy. e13 endorsed Post
u Feb '13 Litdes v Yes, they were Either that or thieves. Takes your pick. r1 reply e10 endorsed Post
Feb '13 DanielZ v I can see both sides To the extent that native people welcomed them, no; to the extent that they cheated and killed native people, yes. e9 endorsed Post
Feb '13 methinks v No, of course not Illegal immigrants to what country? There were various native tribes here, but there was no formal country with formal laws. B1 r3 replies e5 endorsed Post
u Feb '13 standout v I can see both sides my ancesters were cherokees.they did not believe that you owned the land.they also did not believe in lying or stealing. r2 replies e6 endorsed Post
Feb '13 ASmith v Yes, they were They were not just illegal immigrants but imperialists, colonialists and mass murderers. Send them and their descendants back to Europe. r1 reply e4 endorsed Post
u Feb '13 bobrob v Yes, they were Not only were they illegal, but also immoral. The manner in which they ravished native American women would today get them the penthouse suite the slammer. r1 reply e4 endorsed Post