22 hr mikev9359 v Yes, definitely Not only for the severely ill. Any patient that may benefit from the use of marijuana, should be prescribed marijuana. Post
Tue martydotcom v Yes, definitely I have watch a loved one go from <90lbs back to former 125lbs 'nuff said! Post
Mon Calfkiller v Yes, definitely I know of a doctor who grows it and gives it to patients free of charge. I know this because my sister in laws uncle is stage 4 pancreatic cancer( yeah I know sisters, brothers, dogs, uncle). But it's true. He is willing to go to court for the patients as well IF the law raids their house, If they driving around smoking it, it is on them. r1 reply Post
u May 15 CaryNickel v Yes, definitely I'll go one step further and state that it should not even be necessary for a doctor to prescribe marijuana. We are supposedly a nation of adults, who in most cases can take care of ourselves. Marijuana is a plant that grows naturally under the right condition, no different than tomatoes or lettuce. Whether adults want to pick that plant, roll it into paper, light it, and inhale the smoke should be entirely up to that adult. Cigarettes are legal, booze is legal, so should marijuana be. Post
o May 1 TheHandsomeOne v Yes, definitely And reading the stupid posts of so many hypocrites here makes me very ill. earl Post
May 1 NoAmnestyEVER v Yes, definitely This question is too funny. In California doctors will prescribe pot for a blister on your finger. Post
22 hr mikev9359 v Yes, definitely Not only for the severely ill. Any patient that may benefit from the use of marijuana, should be prescribed marijuana. Post
Tue martydotcom v Yes, definitely I have watch a loved one go from <90lbs back to former 125lbs 'nuff said! Post
Mon Calfkiller v Yes, definitely I know of a doctor who grows it and gives it to patients free of charge. I know this because my sister in laws uncle is stage 4 pancreatic cancer( yeah I know sisters, brothers, dogs, uncle). But it's true. He is willing to go to court for the patients as well IF the law raids their house, If they driving around smoking it, it is on them. r1 reply Post
u May 15 CaryNickel v Yes, definitely I'll go one step further and state that it should not even be necessary for a doctor to prescribe marijuana. We are supposedly a nation of adults, who in most cases can take care of ourselves. Marijuana is a plant that grows naturally under the right condition, no different than tomatoes or lettuce. Whether adults want to pick that plant, roll it into paper, light it, and inhale the smoke should be entirely up to that adult. Cigarettes are legal, booze is legal, so should marijuana be. Post
o May 1 TheHandsomeOne v Yes, definitely And reading the stupid posts of so many hypocrites here makes me very ill. earl Post
May 1 NoAmnestyEVER v Yes, definitely This question is too funny. In California doctors will prescribe pot for a blister on your finger. Post
Apr 28 oldman75 v Yes, definitely Why the hell not ? More people hooked on oxycodeine than pot . Post
u Apr 28 jond414 v No, never What about the poor pharmaceutical companies? How are they supposed to compete with mother nature? r1 reply Post
Apr 28 Chris8718 v Yes, definitely Certainly they should! The critically ill should be allowed the pleasures of a delightful send-off, if nothing more can be done for them. Why can't politicians quit interfering in people's private lives, and let the doctors do their jobs as they're properly trained? Suddenly some bureaucrat in Washington knows more about me than my private physician. If a duly licensed physician feels that marijuana should be rightly prescribed to a critically ill patient, then, in my opinion, government has no right getting in the way. Post
Apr '13 BroomeUnder v No, never I don't want to have to go to a doctor to get a proscription for a six pack or a bottle of wine and I sure as hell do not want doctors deciding whether or not I should be allowed to get a buzz in my own home. Post
u Apr '13 babysitter02 v Yes, definitely Various strains of pot have been developed that help certain conditions without the side effects of manufactured drugs. Some types help pain, some help increase hunger, some help with sleep, and the list goes on. Why shouldn't a person with a chronic disease be able to gain relief without the side effects caused by many of the drugs manufactured by drug companies. If regulated and taxed there would be considerable help for the deficit. However, until our lawmakers stop taking the big payouts from the drug companies that will never happen. Post
Apr '13 Aftermath v Yes, definitely If a Doctor feels it is warranted, the government should keep their hands off. I guarantee you the Doctor knows more about it than any elected person. See Doctors go to school, study hard. learn, and take tests to be Doctors. Elected people take no tests, and in many cases being elected simply means you had more half pints on a given day than the other guy. Being elected in no way offers any information into if the person has any sense at all, or just had a pile of daddy's money and nothing to do that day. Post
Mar '13 IBelieve v Yes, definitely http://www.petition2congress.com/9641/kentucky-cannabis-hemp-health-initiative-2013-2014/?fb_action_ids=3043061931743&fb_action_types=og.recommends&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582 Post
u Mar '13 Freewill v Yes, definitely Yes ok if your catholic then listen to this catholic monks use cannabis to be relaxed and meditate and be focused and close to God. I don't get how drinking is legal when all it has done is caused people to crash into a tree car house people etc. and die Cigaretes have chemicals in them they get the tobacco from the ground which is fine natural tobacco is fine nothing wrong with that but what they do with cigaretes is they get tobacco throw it in a factory and put harmful chemicals in the tobacco to get addicted and cause lung cancer, unlike weed you can only die from it if you smoke your body weight which is impossible weed comes from the ground you roll it up and s... Post
u Mar '13 PrintMediaGoon v Only in a very few cases At first relatively few patients should be allowed this treatment, and as the profession becomes accustomed to dealing with such a loaded topic we can change as necessary Post
Mar '13 Decent-Dissent v Yes, definitely Only in severe cases of patriatism. If more republicans played hacky sack, we probably would send way less teenagers to war. Post
Mar '13 DavidC85 v Yes, definitely I don't think there are too many who would choose otherwise: If someone is terminally ill and in pain what the heck is wrong with them taking a few tokes and enjoying what could be their last days on Earth? Heck worse yet they will live a very long life of EXCRUCIATING AGONY then what the heck? Should they be tortured because of some misplaced and very hypocritical "morality" that was really funded by big cotton anyway? Post
Mar '13 PNWest v Yes, definitely If a doctor feels that it will help a patient he should be able to prescribe marijuana regardless of how severely ill the patient is. r1 reply e69 endorsed Post
u Mar '13 BelinKS v Yes, definitely It is fact that marijuana can reduce the amount of narcotic pain medication a severely ill person has to take. That allows the person to interact with friends and family they couldn't before because the narcotics drugged them up so badly. I've seen this personally with my 17 year old step-daughter who had cancer. She came home from the hospital because there was nothing else that could be done. The narcotics in her pain pump kept her so drugged she couldn't interact with friends and family like she wanted to before she died. We allowed her to use marijuana and her hospice nurse was able to drop the narcotics drastically! She had two weeks she was able to completely be ... B2 r2 replies e34 endorsed Post
Mar '13 mimi57 v Yes, definitely Yes and Heroin and Morphine, if they are in pain and dying, whatever nakes them comfortable. There is no need to worry about addiction. B1 e11 endorsed Post
Mar '13 Mr_GO_HERD v Yes, definitely Marijuana shouldn't be illegal in the first place. B2 e8 endorsed Post
Mar '13 jessejaymes v Yes, definitely Well this is a no brainer isn't it? They can prescribe Morphine but not pot? On what planet does this make sense? B2 e7 endorsed Post
u Mar '13 JamesR v No, never It has zero medicinal value. It only alters your state of mind, nothing else. r10 replies e8 endorsed Post
u Mar '13 Meanie v Yes, definitely How does it differ from any other prescribed drug/medication? There are far more damaging drugs than marijuana if not taken properly. If a doctor believes it'll help, go for it. e8 endorsed Post
u Mar '13 tomincali v Only in a very few cases only after proving nothing else works and there is a proven need. here in ca this has gotten out of hand,anyone wanting a medical marijuana card only has to pay for it,no real reason needed cash talks. r23 replies e7 endorsed Post
Mar '13 UKviewpoint v Yes, definitely If the doctor believes it will help the patient they should be able to prescribe any drug but it needs to be carefully controlled to prevent abuse. e3 endorsed Post
u Mar '13 Chromalord v Yes, definitely What wrong with prescribing an herb? Granted, even if pot were 100% legal for all uses, the American doctors still wouldn't prescribe it, no man-made chemicals in it. Western med is anti holistic. e3 endorsed Post