May 14 Aftermath v Yes, absolutely I think they should be allowed on predominately Republican schools. The democrat schools seem fine with gun free status. Then we can see which schools get attacked by crazy people. I know this sounds bad, but think of the democrats that won't make it because of their gun laws. The Republicans will all be fine because killers usually don't go near where they can be killed. Don't forget:Google it : ARMED MARCH ON WASHINGTON D.C JULY 4TH 2013 Thousands are slated to be there. Post
May 14 JohnVicky v No, terrible idea My grade is an D.............you want to rethink that professor????? Post
May 12 jeffreyknee v I have mixed feelings Yes but only if they take a test to detect rage and mental illness, once a year for renewal. Post
u May 7 Gatnos v Yes, absolutely Gun free zones are killing zones. People should be able to defend themselves wherever they may be. Post
May 7 twinertia v I have mixed feelings Hundreds of thousands of blackout drunks with "D" averages, drowning in student loan debt, desperately trying to screw anything with long hair and a pulse.....armed. Yeah, that'll NEVER pose ANY kind of a problem! Go ahead on, though.....wouldn't want that liberty tree wilting just before the photo shoot, now, would we? Post
May 6 PaulUK2901 v No, terrible idea More guns? Give them to students the first time they've left home? Great idea. What could possibly go wrong? Post
u May 6 g89dsw v No, terrible idea We have an open and on-going need for shooters in the military. Post
u May 5 commonsense51 v Yes, absolutely It's called our freedom to protect ourselves from those who would harm us. Liberal eletes have their body guards but they want you & I to be at the mercy of the criminal. Post
u May 5 politicteen v Yes, absolutely It's not high school or elementary. The environment is mature enough. Post
May 4 NoAmnestyEVER v Yes, absolutely Depends on who's carrying them. If it's teachers or the principle yes. If it's the pedophile illegal alien janitor, hell no. Post
u May 3 fraps v Yes, absolutely Not only on campuses, but everywhere. The only restriction on gun possession should be to restrict guns from criminals, violent felons to be specific, and from psychotics etc. Post
May 3 Nurse8493 v No, terrible idea For students who are struggling with identity and self esteem issues, no not a good idea. Post
May 2 scotta v Yes, absolutely That way they can shoot back at the ass clowns shoot at them. Sorry libs this is what I think. What say you? Post
May 2 JTHEM v I have mixed feelings My sister was confronted by an armed man at night in front of the college library steps in Colorado a couple of years ago. He told her to give him her money and she said, "No.!" He asked again. She explained to him the importance of working, smiled at him, and calmingly walked away. Later, the police would not let her get close enough to identify a man caught later in the night. So, he was not detained. I don't think having a concealed weapon would have aided her and might have made it worse. She and I own guns and target shoot. She is a 4th degree black belt. Neither of us would bring a gun onto campus unless there was an immediate pressing concern for safety... Post
May 14 Aftermath v Yes, absolutely I think they should be allowed on predominately Republican schools. The democrat schools seem fine with gun free status. Then we can see which schools get attacked by crazy people. I know this sounds bad, but think of the democrats that won't make it because of their gun laws. The Republicans will all be fine because killers usually don't go near where they can be killed. Don't forget:Google it : ARMED MARCH ON WASHINGTON D.C JULY 4TH 2013 Thousands are slated to be there. Post
May 14 JohnVicky v No, terrible idea My grade is an D.............you want to rethink that professor????? Post
May 12 jeffreyknee v I have mixed feelings Yes but only if they take a test to detect rage and mental illness, once a year for renewal. Post
u May 7 Gatnos v Yes, absolutely Gun free zones are killing zones. People should be able to defend themselves wherever they may be. Post
May 7 twinertia v I have mixed feelings Hundreds of thousands of blackout drunks with "D" averages, drowning in student loan debt, desperately trying to screw anything with long hair and a pulse.....armed. Yeah, that'll NEVER pose ANY kind of a problem! Go ahead on, though.....wouldn't want that liberty tree wilting just before the photo shoot, now, would we? Post
May 6 PaulUK2901 v No, terrible idea More guns? Give them to students the first time they've left home? Great idea. What could possibly go wrong? Post
u May 6 g89dsw v No, terrible idea We have an open and on-going need for shooters in the military. Post
u May 5 commonsense51 v Yes, absolutely It's called our freedom to protect ourselves from those who would harm us. Liberal eletes have their body guards but they want you & I to be at the mercy of the criminal. Post
u May 5 politicteen v Yes, absolutely It's not high school or elementary. The environment is mature enough. Post
May 4 NoAmnestyEVER v Yes, absolutely Depends on who's carrying them. If it's teachers or the principle yes. If it's the pedophile illegal alien janitor, hell no. Post
u May 3 fraps v Yes, absolutely Not only on campuses, but everywhere. The only restriction on gun possession should be to restrict guns from criminals, violent felons to be specific, and from psychotics etc. Post
May 3 Nurse8493 v No, terrible idea For students who are struggling with identity and self esteem issues, no not a good idea. Post
May 2 scotta v Yes, absolutely That way they can shoot back at the ass clowns shoot at them. Sorry libs this is what I think. What say you? Post
May 2 JTHEM v I have mixed feelings My sister was confronted by an armed man at night in front of the college library steps in Colorado a couple of years ago. He told her to give him her money and she said, "No.!" He asked again. She explained to him the importance of working, smiled at him, and calmingly walked away. Later, the police would not let her get close enough to identify a man caught later in the night. So, he was not detained. I don't think having a concealed weapon would have aided her and might have made it worse. She and I own guns and target shoot. She is a 4th degree black belt. Neither of us would bring a gun onto campus unless there was an immediate pressing concern for safety... Post
Apr 29 Prime_Meridian v Yes, absolutely Yes. http://policeandguncontrol.blogspot.com And the vast majority of 15,595 police officers, ranging in rank from Chief to Patrol Officer, all across the USA agrees. See replies to questions No. 19 through 23 in the poll taken by www.policeone.com, an organization of some 400,000 police officers from all across the USA. Survey was taken between March 4 and March 13, 2013. Pay particular attention how most of them also feel about the recently defeated legislation, about 'assault weapons' and about extended capacity magazines. There are 28 questions in all. Post
Apr 28 MemphisTiger89 v Yes, absolutely Any Gun Free Zone is a magnet for anyone intent on killing. When did you last hear of a mass shooting at an NRA event, a shooting range, or a police station. Mass killers may be crazy, but not necessarily stupid. Post
Apr 26 Waynestew v Yes, absolutely Sure why not. In this gun happy society you gotta stay straped. Smh Post
u Apr '13 Lpagano v No, terrible idea No, this is a place for learning not gun toting. Students would be too afraid to learn and experience college because they're afraid of pissing people off that carry concealed weapons who think it's their right to settle disputes with gun violence. There's not to mention multiple students carrying concealed weapons who, at all the same time under duress or threat, whip out their guns and start firing at some identified danger, inevitably missing their mark due to heightened stress, physiological and psychological reactions firing into the crowd. This is a really bad idea. A bunch of uncoordinated individuals firing guns that only a few have competence to wield. I do n... Post
Mar '13 bsking v Yes, absolutely Absolutely and gun free zones should be renamed " target rich environment" B5 r5 replies e65 endorsed Post
u Mar '13 Chromalord v No, terrible idea By the students? Heck no! That's all we need is a convenient way for students who are pissed about their tuition, their grades, why little Johnny didnt make the team, etc., to start on a psycho rampage. r3 replies e22 endorsed Post
Mar '13 DavidRobertson v Yes, absolutely "Gun free" zones are misnamed. They disarm the lawful, but in doing so create "criminal empowerment zones" where they can (AND DO) victimize people unopposed. Let those who wish to be armed do so. B3 r7 replies e17 endorsed Post
o Mar '13 NTBFW v Yes, absolutely Yes!! We aren't taking about grade schoolers here. Right now you have to be 21 to get a concealed permit. By the time you are 21 you have demonstrated whether you are responsible or not. But any sign of irresponsible behavior with a gun should be dealt with by the school harshly. The school could even require a safety class. But those students are qualified to take up arms for the country. The least you could do is let them defend themselves. B3 e13 endorsed Post
Mar '13 eieio v Yes, absolutely To ban guns, because criminals use them, is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will allow... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding. B7 r1 reply e6 endorsed Post
Mar '13 FaFoxy v Yes, absolutely The SCOTUS justices once famously said that your "constitutional RIGHTS do not end at the schoolhouse door." B5 r1 reply e5 endorsed Post
u Mar '13 riggers v Yes, absolutely I think if a college is a private entity it should make up it's own mind about what it allows it's patrons to do. However if the college is publicly owned then it should definitely allow adults to carry weapons. I don't agree with concealed carry tho, permits violate our right to bear arms. B5 r1 reply e3 endorsed Post
Mar '13 MarkJM v Yes, absolutely If they were allowed on VA Tech in 2007, I bet Cho wouldn't have capped as many innocent lives. It's already proven that a cowardly gun-nut will turn that firearm on himself at the first sign of "a good guy with a gun" or law enforcement officer. So yes, I say allow for carry concealed on campus. Those law-abiding citizens pose NO threat to anyone and if anything it would deter a possible mad person from wanting to shoot up the place. B4 r1 reply e3 endorsed Post
Mar '13 Mike_Monacelli Considering only 40-70 gun homicides by CCW holders occur a year, out of the 8,000-10,000 total gun homicides a year, I'd say you are incorrect sir. B7 Post @Mike_Monacelli
Mar '13 bsking @NTBFW it's definitely part of their plan. I have a business card that I hand out to restaurants or stores anywhere where they say guns not welcome it reads " I respect your right as the owner of this business to not want concealed weapons holders as part of your clientele so in the future I will take my business elsewhere, my disagreement with your position originates rom the fact that by being a concealed weapon permit holder you already know I have successfully past an intensive background check by the State Police and have undergone training in the safe use of my firearm, and have no criminal record. how much do you know about your other patrons?.. B7 Post @bsking