pWould you support Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) for president in 2016?

Next>

Results

40 %

No, heâs a union-buster

38 %

Yes, heâd be great

22 %

I'd have to think about it

@Mar '13 c 78 comments V 306 votes

Detailed Results Next Debate Vote Now

Activity Stmts Popular

306 Votes

o

Mon
randy28 voted

v I'd have to think about it
Mon
GodlessLiberal voted

v No, heâs a union-buster
Mon
falco_alba voted

v No, heâs a union-buster
May 19
mikev9359 voted

v Yes, heâd be great
u

May 19
DesignerLM voted

v No, heâs a union-buster
May 18

Goose

v Yes, heâd be great

If he will announce a non-interventionist foreign policy, and insist on NO debt-ceiling increases (must balance it!) I'm behind him 100%.

Post
May 18
Mournwolf voted

v I'd have to think about it
u

May 17
Mallard endorsed pfloyd

v Yes, heâd be great
u

May 17
DrSilicon voted

v Yes, heâd be great
May 16
LHoran voted

v Yes, heâd be great
u

May 16
Obsidion endorsed ZombieMedic

v I'd have to think about it
May 16
RadAuthNat voted

v Yes, heâd be great
May 16
littlewolf8469 voted

v No, heâs a union-buster
May 16

TheLoneRanger

v Yes, heâd be great

Yes because he is a union buster.

Post
May 16

Zazziness

v I'd have to think about it

I would support not starting the 2016 campaign season prior to 2016.

Post
May 15
Smoothbeartoo voted

v Yes, heâd be great
u

May 14
MensaMan voted

v No, heâs a union-buster
May 13
jimsnoek voted

v I'd have to think about it
May 13
looncraz endorsed pfloyd

v Yes, heâd be great
u

May 12
JumpRoundhouse endorsed ZombieMedic

v I'd have to think about it
u

May 12

gherlone

v Yes, heâd be great

fighting the idiocy of public unions is a good start. he seems to have some good ideas - I'd really have to hear more, though.

Post
u

May 12
Fyi1957 endorsed ErnestPayne

v No, heâs a union-buster
May 11
AlexNWA endorsed ProgressiveDem

v No, heâs a union-buster
May 9
Philof endorsed pfloyd

v Yes, heâd be great
May 9
harold_lloyd voted

v Yes, heâd be great
u

May 9
Jimbo voted

v No, heâs a union-buster
u

May 9
Bill voted

v Yes, heâd be great
u

May 9

furdmonster

v Yes, heâd be great

BECAUSE he's a union buster.

B1

Post
u

May 9
TerryConklin endorsed Realthinker

v I'd have to think about it
May 9
DARSB endorsed jessejaymes

v No, heâs a union-buster
u

May 9
DanielZ endorsed ErnestPayne

v No, heâs a union-buster
u

May 8
SlimElmo91 voted

v I'd have to think about it
May 8

whatheheck

v I'd have to think about it

WHO??

Post
u

May 7
RevJdubs316 endorsed cwi530

v Yes, heâd be great
u

May 7
LilliB voted

v Yes, heâd be great
u

May 7
mejiakay1986 voted

v No, heâs a union-buster
May 7
oldtimer2 endorsed ZombieMedic

v I'd have to think about it
u

May 7
silentrunning endorsed commonsense51

v Yes, heâd be great
May 6
Johnnytj voted

v No, heâs a union-buster
u

May 6
gitrdone8383 voted

v No, heâs a union-buster
u

May 6
LEC endorsed ErnestPayne

v No, heâs a union-buster
May 6
PaulUK2901 endorsed ProgressiveDem

v No, heâs a union-buster
u

May 6
vws endorsed ZombieMedic

v I'd have to think about it
May 6

PayThatCEO

v No, heâs a union-buster

Absolutely not. Period.

Post
May 6

Prime_Meridian

v I'd have to think about it

I'd have to think about it. But if the choice is Scott Walker or Hillary Clinton, I'm voting for Walker.

Post
u

May 6
joyshusband endorsed cwi530

v Yes, heâd be great
May 5
ktwolf voted

v No, heâs a union-buster
May 5
Tralee voted

v Yes, heâd be great
u

May 5
oldnavyguy88 voted

v Yes, heâd be great
u

May 3

tomincali

v I'd have to think about it

maybe if he was running against what difference does it make clinton

Post

May 18

Goose

v Yes, heâd be great

If he will announce a non-interventionist foreign policy, and insist on NO debt-ceiling increases (must balance it!) I'm behind him 100%.

Post
May 16

TheLoneRanger

v Yes, heâd be great

Yes because he is a union buster.

Post
May 16

Zazziness

v I'd have to think about it

I would support not starting the 2016 campaign season prior to 2016.

Post
u

May 12

gherlone

v Yes, heâd be great

fighting the idiocy of public unions is a good start. he seems to have some good ideas - I'd really have to hear more, though.

Post
u

May 9

furdmonster

v Yes, heâd be great

BECAUSE he's a union buster.

B1

Post
May 8

whatheheck

v I'd have to think about it

WHO??

Post
May 6

PayThatCEO

v No, heâs a union-buster

Absolutely not. Period.

Post
May 6

Prime_Meridian

v I'd have to think about it

I'd have to think about it. But if the choice is Scott Walker or Hillary Clinton, I'm voting for Walker.

Post
u

May 3

tomincali

v I'd have to think about it

maybe if he was running against what difference does it make clinton

Post
May 2

Spirit02

v No, heâs a union-buster

He would only be another Mutt Robme lying his way to the WH, or like W in the WH only worst.

Post
May 2

Mr_me

v No, heâs a union-buster

Union buster. That's about the worst thing I can think to call someone.

Post
u

Apr 30

Angry_man

v I'd have to think about it

I'd damn near vote for anybody that has a (R) by their name, over This POS that's in office now.

r2 replies

Post
May 9

harold_lloyd

And that's why you get Todd akin and Michele Bachmann. Can't you please find a moderate Republican?

Post @harold_lloyd
u

May 9

Angry_man

@harold_lloyd I would love too if one would run. But we're scraping the bottom of the barrel on both sides these days.

Post @Angry_man
u

Apr 28

Ddawg

v I'd have to think about it

I don't care about unions but I believe Scott Walker has no intent in being a transparent politician, and in addition he appears to care more about businesses than people. So, No for those reasons.

r1 reply

Post
May 6

joyshusband

Please tell what has Gov. Scott Walker done that wasn't transparent.

Post @joyshusband
Apr '13

NNN

v Yes, heâd be great

Absolutely. The unions nationwide need to be smashed - Walker's the right man for it.

B1

Post
u

Mar '13

drivemenutz54

v Yes, heâd be great

Good man. Hardcore Conservative values which we desperately need NOW. If he runs versus Hillary Ho-down he will win easily.

Post
Mar '13

Clara007

v No, heâs a union-buster

Detest Scott Walker? Let me count the ways. Walker is/was bought and paid for by the Koch brothers. Walker's associates and perhaps Walker himself is up to his neck in fraud. Walker has a criminal defense fund and a team of attorneys from...Wisconsin....NOPE--Chicago. Walker has maligned teachers, librarians, police and firefighters, labeling them welfare recipients. Walker is a liar and a hypocrite who has divided the good people of Wisconsin. Like so many conservatives his campaign touted "fiscal responsibility" and then he gutted the state. Walker needs to go.

Post
u

Mar '13

Randolph61

v I'd have to think about it

Post
u

Mar '13

Robocop3447

v I'd have to think about it

I prefer a Libertarian candidate receive my vote. It was who I voted for in the last election. There isn't a dimes worth of difference between Dems and GOP. Both love big government and attendant lavish spending. How about leaving people free to pursue their own happiness and get the government back to its limited role of defense, enforcing contracts and settling legal disputes. No more world policeman work or nation building. Flat tax eliminates the special interest groups and EVERYONE contributes.

Post
Mar '13

scotta

v Yes, heâd be great

From what I saw of his no b.s. way of doing business. I would.

Post
Mar '13

MolonLabe

v Yes, heâd be great

The first time in decades my state is in the black with balanced budgets and people don't like him because of whiny unions? At least he understands the concept of a budget, unlike Obozo.

B2

Post
R Load more comments...

u

Mar '13

ErnestPayne

v No, heâs a union-buster

Walker is just another stooge ready, willing, and able to do the bidding of his donors. He does not have the interest of average americans in his heart. Vote for him if you want to be poorer.

r5 replies

e26 endorsed

Post
Mar '13

pfloyd

v Yes, heâd be great

He has fair ideas....We will not just keep giving in to unions.Unions started out as good things, now they just take and want control !

B2

e20 endorsed

Post
Mar '13

ZombieMedic

v I'd have to think about it

Too early, and depends on where he stands on the Constitution on other issues. Is he with America and the Bill of Rights, or against it like many politicians.

B1

e13 endorsed

Post
u

Mar '13

cwi530

v Yes, heâd be great

Yes. He's a union buster. He gets more done in one day then Hillary did in four years. If Walker get a 3am life or death phone call he would do whatever is needed to save American lives. Hillary didn't answer the call and turned her back as Americans were slaughtered. She's a disgrace and a failure.

B4

e8 endorsed

Post
u

Mar '13

commonsense51

v Yes, heâd be great

How many times must we say..... A bag of rocks would be better than Obama. If you run Pat Paulson i will vote for him over Obama. How about running Ottis from the Andy Griffith show? He would be far better than Obama. Even a drunk man knows you don't force people to pay for abortions and you don't take their fire arms.

B1

r2 replies

e4 endorsed

Post
u

Mar '13

Realthinker

v I'd have to think about it

Obviously it depend on who else decides to run. It's much too soon for this kind of poll.

B1

e3 endorsed

Post
Mar '13

ST_Louie_Sue

v Yes, heâd be great

His stance on unions alone gets my vote.

B3

r1 reply

Post
Mar '13

marine1

v Yes, heâd be great

Hell Yes

e3 endorsed

Post
Mar '13

Waynestew

v No, heâs a union-buster

Not only no but HELL NO!!

e3 endorsed

Post
Mar '13

methinks

He's a PUBLIC union buster. Even FDR was against public sector unionization. When seniors living on fixed incomes are worried as to how they are going to pay their school tax bill when teacher and administrator salaries take 2/3 out of the total budget, then we have a problem. I have no issues with private sector unions because no one is forcing you to buy a product. If you don't pay your taxes, you to to jail.

B3

Post @methinks

Politix

pWould you support Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) for president in 2016?

Results