pShould doctor-assisted suicide be legal?

No, my point is that it is your own body and you should have the right to do what you want to it. Mentioning abortion only shows precedent. Just like a woman has a legal right to get an abortion on the grounds that it is "her own body," then we should have the right to use drugs since it is our own body, and the right to self-terminate on the basis of it being our body.

You mention the Hippocratic Oath. Nobody really follows it anymore, and it has been rewritten so many times. It not only banned assisted suicide and abortion, but also assisting in capital punishment. In addition, it required experienced doctors to train other doctors and not to charge excessive fees for their services. So of all those, assisted suicide is the only one that doctors heed. Should "first do no harm" apply to patients whose sole intent is to do themselves harm? Doctors have enough problem with apotemnophiliacs (those with an amputation fetish). These patients will cut off healthy limbs, with or without a doctor's assistance, because the "pain" of having them is too great, just like the suicidal person has pain so great they want to die.

I never said killing the unborn rationalized killing anyone else. The premise there is that it is your own body. Whether it means getting a fetus out of your body, putting drugs in your body, putting holes in your body, placing marks in your skin, deciding you don't want healthy limbs, or making the ultimate decision about your body. So the law should be consistent, either allow ALL procedures on the basis of it being your body, or ban ALL unnecessary procedures to your body. Abortion is generally unnecessary because generally, the woman had the right to say no to the particular encounter which caused the pregnancy.