Best
189 Comments
Post
  • #57
    !
    I voted 'No' to this.

    I don't want the Tea Party to listen and follow his advise. In fact, they should amp up the hostile anti- Dems, anti-Obama rhetoric until it's over the top!

    And Go Hillary 2016!!
  • #62
    !
    @Laradian All the Tea Party has to do is split the Republican Party in half and they won't see the White house for 20 years. I've got no dog in this race, so they can do whatever they want. As far the futility of their battle, all they have to do is go back to the '64 Goldwater campaign to see where their type of philosophy will get them. The difference between the two eras is that Goldwater was an honest man who had the country's well being at heart. These people don't. They're just self-absorbed egotists who think they should be able to do whatever they please.
  • #72
    !
    @Laradian I agree, they should ramp up the rhetoric, keep talking their hateful, bigoted, racist garbage to all the other hateful racist bigots to suck in and repeat. They're SURE to win the hearts of the majority of America with THAT attitude!!
  • #91
    !
    @Laradian
    Yeah, Hillary, the contentious, obnoxious, elitist liar who is the smartest women in the room. LOL Run, Hillary, run!
  • #94
    !
    As one who couldn't give a shit if Hillary runs, or if the Tea Party takes over the fucked up Republican Party, I have only one thing to tell you, be careful, you may get what you wish for.
  • R Load more replies

  • #22
    !
    @PolitixDain, where's the option for "It doesn't matter what Rand Paul says to the Tea Party"? The Tea Party started out as a reasonable protest against the high taxation of the middle class, but has devolved into a "white Christians only" club. Inclusiveness doesn't seem to be in their vocabulary.
  • #52
    !
    You're half right, we don't care what Rand has to say. The other part is a lie. Again, liberals are obsessed with skin color.
  • R Load more replies

  • #13
    !
    This is a serious reply, which means that no one will notice it. No wonder I post humorous comments every now and then. Too many people in this forum wouldn't know a serious post if it didn't use liberal or conservative three times in every sentence.
  • #88
    !
    How about a choice for folks who think this article is nonsense? When Ted Nugent can call Barack Obama a name and it makes headlines nationally, yet angry leftists can call for hanging George W. Bush and Dick Cheney at the Hague and it's met by the media with chirping crickets in otherwise dead silence, it's hard for me to take a story like this seriously.

    Perhaps we should re-write the old kindergarten rhyme to make it easier to understand by the average leftist:

    "Hanging at the Hague is deadly as plague, but names will never hurt me."
  • #8
    !
    "RAND PAUL TO TEA PARTY: BE HAPPIER, MORE INCLUSIVE, AND STOP NAME-CALLING
    and maybe read books on: The Boston Tea Party, Economics 101, and Politics for Dummies.
  • #90
    !
    I can't help but notice that no one from the left told Harry Reid to reel it in when he called millions of people who had trouble with the Obama Care web site liars. And, how much real coverage does the Tea Party get from the mostly liberal media?
  • #45
    !
    But Harried Reid, Obama, and Pelosi can call republicans obstructionist, terrorist, and other vile names. But liberals are OK with that.
  • #70
    !
    @Bobolinsky -- I didn;t call anyone a name unless you consider "liberal" to be a "name." I woulda thought that the Lefties would see that and not embarrass themselves by voting down my comment asking Hahamango what he meant.

    What is that term that Lefties like to use to refer to the Tea Party?
  • #71
    !
    @Bleeding_Blue Oh you couldn't have timed that any better Bleeding_Blue. I'm sure you can tell everyone what you Lefties like to call Tea Partiers.
  • R Load more replies

  • #30
    !
    I always laugh when a conservative figure advises the conservative base to be more polite. Every single time, they respond by being more awful than before.
  • #14
    !
    But he forgets he is just as much a problem as any of the GOP in the regard he is condemning.

    He called Bill Clinton a "womanizer" that the media did not cover. He seemingly does not know the media gave Bill's dalliances 24/7 coverage.
  • #92
    !
    @WMCOL
    I didn't know you could un-abuse women, and I haven't heard that he ever apologised to the women who didn't want his advances. The rest of them , like the looney Lawinski are just as bad as Bill.
  • R Load more comments...
Post