Best
699 Comments
Post
  • #15
    !
    It's non-story now - it's more like an announcement. I thought there would be more to story than just a wedding.
  • #26
    !
    @N0rthman It's more exciting when a gay couple sues a gun club for not wanting to hold a gay wedding on their land, even though the gay couple has no affiliation with the club. They couldn't live without the attention they crave.
  • R Load more replies

  • Comment removed for Engagement Etiquette violation. Replies may also be deleted.
  • #31
    !
    I'm with you on this.

    But I'd also like to talk about the double standards of censorship on Politix. You used one of the "7 words you can't say on TV" (we miss you George Carlin) and your comment is at the top of the stack. Yesterday I made a comment using a term referring to a female dog and had it removed by the moderators.

    Specifically I said that if you were not (B)ig (B)usiness, a (B)illionaire, a (B)igot or(B)ible Thumper that by voting (R) you were allowing them to make you their (B)****.

    Why was that comment pulled and yours allowed? I am not saying your comment should be removed - it shouldn't. But neither should mine have been removed.

    STOP THE DOUBLE STANDARDS!
  • #49
    !
    @PNWest

    Double standards are just a canard
    one must grow up and hoist yourself up on your own petard,
    life is not always fair
    just try not to land on your derry air
    So maybe words do matter
    and some words come out making a bad batter
    Rather than cook fast food
    make a quisine of words that are good
  • R Load more replies

  • #71
    !
    YUP ! Two male carpenters boinking each other is MUCH HOTTER than two male lawyers boinking each other.(First thing we do is kill all the lawyers !:))
  • #427
    !
    she deserves being the new face for sodomy.. now when any one looks at her that is what they will think of
  • #568
    !
    @FaFoxy - Yeah, but the lawyers are named Danny and Danny!!! Can't you SEE the humor in that??? Can't you just hear Danny telling Danny how much he loves him and Danny replying Danny, I love you too, so much!" Pretty soon they think they are talking to themselves!!!! Oh, Danny Boy, oh boy, oh boy!!!!!
  • R Load more replies

  • #16
    !
    Q. In the real world, who wouldn't want a SCOTUS judge perform their wedding ceremony?
    A. Almost any couple would jump at the chance to memorialize your wedding this way.....but then again, I said REAL WORLD.
  • #187
    !
    @dances-weebles
    You have to wonder how many Secret Service folks ended up attending that wedding.....but it would be cool to exit your own reception by asking Ginsberg's police escort to leave with you, with your tin-cans, old shoes, and balloons streaming behind your getaway vehicle!
    __________

    The best wedding "gag" i ever saw was the Best Man getting up just before the ceremony itself, and very, very seriously, asking everyone in attendance, over 300 people, "The newlyweds are gong to be spending afew days of the honeymoon at the Groom's apartment...so, if you happen to have an old key with you to the Groom's apartment, leftover from years past, please graciously bring it up here now to the front, and return it to the Groom....thanks everyone......"

    Note: This was after almost every young woman who came to the church was handed a key on the way INTO the event, by a couple ushers, with no explanation given except "we are going to have a special lottery drawing...hang on to that key!"
    The keys came out of a coffee-can with 200-300 different old and rusted keys. The ushers also handed out a dozen or so keys to a few, 260lb big, bad, muscular dudes and a couple extremely old men, and couple grannies.

    The line that formed after the announcement, and the laughter as everyone in attendance realized the gag, along with the poor Bride, who had NO idea or foreknowledge, was priceless.
    Sort of like annoyance, as two girls came up, then astonishment as a dozen ladies followed, and then laughter as the he-men and old guys and grannies caned their way up or staggered up to the podium.
    Anyway, sorry for the long post, but I had never heard of this particualr gag before, so I thought I'd pass it on.
  • R Load more replies

  • #171
    !
    This nation said " move out God" we can run a country better than you! Now look at the mess we are in. Yes, ONE nation, under God!!! NO MORE!!
  • #115
    !
    He can perform all the same sex wedding he wants. Doesn't make it so in the eyes of the Lord. Just based on the Bible, before ya 'all flame me.
  • #188
    !
    Excuse me, I THINK Ruth is a gal, not a he....certainly appears to be a he, though....sad, we can't tell the boy from the girl!!!
  • Comment removed for Engagement Etiquette violation. Replies may also be deleted.
  • #286
    !
    @laverne_boyd Goodness, what has your tail got to do with other people's personal lives and legal business. Where have you been? Gay rights have been fought for since the 1900's. If you do not know anything about a subject, at least inform yourself before you make such foolish remarks. I wish you good studying. Try Wikipedia.
  • R Load more replies

  • #570
    !
    @loonkiller - Whose Mother??? Not mine - she was the most beautiful woman ever and certainly no heshe like this woman who performs the goofy weddings. She could cook anything in the world and it was always good, too.....what was YOUR mother like? And why in hell do you call yourself Loonkiller, is that to try to scare people?
  • #477
    !
    @loonkiller I guess you miss my point. Most others got it though. Perhaps if you think on it a bit longer it will come to you.
  • #74
    !
    @Skeebo1 "This is wrong, and should NOT be accepted!"

    Don't accept it. Nobody's making you. Just keep remembering that American moraity requires "liberty and justice for all."
  • #110
    !
    @GenPatton "Who's morals? Certainly not his or God's."

    *American* morality as laid out in the pledge of allegiance. Didn't you think "one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all" was a moral statement?
  • #181
    !
    @GenPatton As you SHOULD BE well aware, not all Protestant denominations, nor other religious faiths, agree on whether marriages between same-sex partners is moral or not. Some say yes, some say no. So people can, certainly disagree on whether it is moral or not. I say: "YES !:)"
  • R Load more replies

  • #56
    !
    @twodogscat56

    I hope she doesn't die or retire for a long time, but I understand your point. Hillary will probably appoint a better replacement, no?
  • R Load more replies

  • Comment removed for Engagement Etiquette violation. Replies may also be deleted.
  • #23
    !
    I think people are missing the big picture here, it is two NY lawyers what are both named Danny.
  • #246
    !
    One says "I love you, Danny" and the other says to him "I love YOU, Danny" - suddenly Danny thinks he is talking to himself and getting senile!!!!
  • #36
    !
    Can you get any sillier than this old lady? She wants to be relevant is all, the left was trying to get her to step aside for some one more radical than she is.
  • #150
    !
    " Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.... officiat...ing.... at a same-sex wedding...." shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone
    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg In preforming this union of Same-sex male, partners is just verifying her credentials as a true leftists/liberal.
    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, In preforming this union of Same-sex male, partners, is just verifying her credentials as a leftists/liberal,this ceremony is her Bona fides establishing the fact that she still is the same leftist woman that she was when she represented and did work for the NAACP.
  • #285
    !
    This old lady is more educated and experienced than any choice we have for this moment. Now is the time for the Constitution to be upheld, and for the SCOTUS to not permit the butchery of civil and personal rights by these Teapublicans seeking to create a theocratic Fascist regime. Justice Ginsberg has a long standing reputation for upholding the law. SCOTUS is supposed to be neither Left or Right. I do so wish John Roberts would get hit by a bus; he is a disgrace to the Court.
  • #310
    !
    Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a prime example of why Supreme court Justices shouldn't be allowed to stay on the Supreme Court for life.
    Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a prime example of an ideologue who's decisions are already predetermined by her personal political prejudices before a case ever comes before her to be ruled upon.Justice is supposed to be impartical, but in Ruth Bader Ginsburg's case its her, who is blinded by her personal leftist prejudices.
  • #389
    !
    @Speedieg How damning , the thought that there are some Supreme court justices that might read and "Follow the Bible, and the The 10 Commandments.
  • R Load more replies

  • R Load more comments...
Post