• #2
    Seems to me she's done nothing wrong at her current job. Matter of fact seems she could be a good example of how poor decisions in your youth can affect your future
  • #30
    i don't know about the rest of the country and what i see here in ca she cannot make matters worst,we have day care on campus there are kids having kids,if she worked and did not get preg she has to be a better teacher than what our schools have been teaching on the subject
  • #105
    @marine1 I'm generally conservative, more libertarian. As long as she is doing her job, I don't see why what her previous job has to do with anything. Everyone watches porn, it's legal, get of the high horse.
  • R Load more replies

  • #12
    I'm don't agree with you're pinning this on "Bible thumpers" but I agree, she as well as anyone else deserves a chance and at a redeemed life and she should take it to the Supreme Court.

    Reminds me a little of:

    John 8:1-11
    King James Version (KJV)

    8 Jesus went unto the mount of Olives.

    2 And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them.

    3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,

    4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.

    5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?

    6 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.

    7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

    8 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

    9 And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.

    10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?

    11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.
  • #20
    @jessejaymes The point is Jesus loves us enough like this lady to give her the grace while these people were ready to stone her....this adult film star deserves that much....seems like she is cleaning up her life....would be a great lesson to students....
  • #21
    @Knightmare the difference is sir, there are multitudes of "online preachers" that their lengthy sermons turn people off to the point they are trying to make whereas a simply sentence will suffice to slam the point home that few can deny.
  • R Load more replies

  • #4
    I guess I could see this decision making sense if the prior acts were illegal, but in this case? Maybe we're looking more at the "ick factor" from the judges than an impartial legal decision. I hope she appeals.
  • #8
    She should have asked for a jury to decide. IfiI was on jury I would have asked to review certain evidence of her former career everyday we deliberated.
    Seriously, why weren't my teachers like her? Maybe I shouldn't have gone to that Christian BROTHERS h.s.
  • #14
    People should realize by now, we live in the information age, and any kid who has access to a computer has access to porn. I don't think she should be permitted to
    teach, not so much for what she did previously, but for what kids are able to 'see'
    her do know. It's not professional,(on an educators level )...and it's not a good example for young women. Sometimes our mistakes come back to bite us. That's
  • #24
    But every porn site is required by law to tell those who click on their site that it is illegal for minors to be on that site and they must lie and say they are of age to get on the site. So they have committed a federal crime when they go on the site. Which means this is illegally obtained evidence against her. You're certainly not for a society where illegally obtained evidence can be used you are you?
  • #53
    @jessejaymes Come on Jesse, kids are more computer savvy than adults are, all
    they have to do is type in porn or something more indepth... what are we going to do
    put all the teens who click on porn sites and get a 'taste' in jail?... Get real.
  • #57
    @mimi57 Doesn't change the fact that what the kids did was illegal and we don't convict people in the USA based on illegally obtained evidence.
  • #3
    Wow, politix is really on a roll today with tough stuff. I don't know that I would like my children(when I have them) knowing that their teacher was in that particular industry, especially since clips are so readily available. There was no mention of her record of teaching. She might be the best teacher ever, who can get through to kids. There just isn't enough here to make a definite decision, but I'm leaning towards it is no Bueno!!
  • #7
    What I want to know is how do minors find out she was in the industry? And why is illegally obtained information used against her?
  • #11
    I agree with your statement. Kinda torn on this one myself. Should she be punished forever for something that's not illegal? On the other hand would most parents accept her as their child's teacher? Tough one indeed.
  • #15
    @OhWiseOne Here's another question. This isn't liberals opposing this woman. This is the Christian right segment of America. So if a serial killer child rapist can "be born again" 5 minutes before he is executed and go to heaven, why can't a porn actress do the same and live her life productively? What's the difference?
  • R Load more replies

  • #99
    She could move to another state where there are not so many perverts looking for that kind of thing. She would probably not draw any attention at all. Or go into politics. No amount of slimeball past will pose any problems in that profession, especially if she is a Democrat.
  • #98
  • #43
    Well, I've been turning this over in my mind, wondering what I would want to do if it had any effect on my children, were they in the school she taught at.
    If she was conducting herself properly and not "fooling around" with some of the students as some who never worked the porn industry have done, and was a good and effective teacher, I don't think it'd bother me.
    This is just more proof that so many parents just don't know or care what their children are doing or watching on the computer.
  • #76
    I agree, it shouldn't be cause for dismissal. And I agree that not only should parents pay more attention to the influences in their children's lives, but they should also have regular discussions about the pros and cons of those influences. That always worked for me as a parent.
  • #32
    I dont know anybody INCLUDING THE HIGH AND MIGHTY FEMALE JUDGE that hasnt done somethign that they arent proud of.... If this lady is a good educator, then let her educate. Perhaps her past woudl also stop another young lady from folling in her footsteps.
  • #6
    I think this judge is overreaching here .(maybe he saw the video.)haha but how old were these kids and shouldnt it be an issue that they are looking at Porn if they're under 18? I wouldn't have a problem with her instructing my lil guy..
  • #114
    She shouldn't be legally prohibited from teaching. But I do think any school that doesn't want to hire her has a right not to. I also think it's a dumb career choice when you know each new batch of kids every year is going to be passing around embarrassing pictures or photos. I don't see how she'd be able to maintain students' (or parents) respect. But if she wants to put herself through that hell and the school thinks she's such a fantastic teacher that she's worth putting up with complaints from parents, I don't think a judge has any business barring her from the profession.
  • #113
    if she was an illegal alien on welfare they would commend her effrots to improve herself but she was not on the free hand outs so her past will always be held against. i love the liberal double standard............
  • #112
    How is that a teacher previously being a Pornstar can affect Junior High students? I don't get it students aren't allowed to view pornographic material they are underage. So in other words her students to view her pornographic material would have to commit an illegal act. Any of her colleagues who want to criticize her for it to find out would have to watch pornography. In other words a panel of judges ruled and more or less a law has been passed in California that bans adult film stars from being school teachers? It also apparently means that anyone who was in an adult film cannot be a professional in any other capacity. Its a completely ridiculous violation of Liberty...ridiculous. Im disgusted.
  • R Load more comments...