Best
211 Comments
Post
  • #7
    !
    Who cares about liberal outrage? I most certainly do not. When did liberals start caring about dead children? They are the ones who keep the abortion mills running. They hate Rush because of his ideology and they are flat out jealous of the audience he gets. Liberals are never happy. They are always offended. Who cares? LOL! Next.
  • #15
    !
    Could it be because fetuses aren't yet children? Republican priorities:
    1) Guns
    2) Money
    3) Guns
    4) Money
    5) Fetuses
    Skip a few
    9999934) Children who have been expelled from the birth canal.
  • #24
    !
    @Cheenoguy You are wrong. Not that you care about that. Democratic priorities:
    1)Baby killing on demand
    2) Victimhood
    3) Redistribution
    4) Fear mongering
    5) Unlimited immigration, legal or illegal
  • Comment removed for Engagement Etiquette violation. Replies may also be deleted.
  • #46
    !
    @Cheenoguy I am offended at your gross mischaracterization of republican priorities. How dare you claim that money is the #2 priority of the GOP. There never was and never will be a time that money is not the Number One priority of the republicans.
  • R Load more replies

  • #18
    !
    Not unless someone shoots at them. we've moved on to gun control we left abortion behind us for now, will pick that up again at the midterms...
  • #173
    !
    Fetuses aren't people. Corporations are.
    It's a crazy world, and you're not helping.

    Any argument that relies on name-calling should be relegated to the school playground.
  • #182
    !
    @bsking Just never could understand how you can be for killing babies but don't want folks to be able to protect themselves with a gun and is it worse to shoot each other at 18 as opposed to stabbing a baby in the neck before its first breath?
  • #186
    !
    @drpeeper

    Amen I agree 100%
    also
    we must also not hesitate to consider how we as a society, with radical secular progressive liberal union teachers, are possibly contributing to the growth of these academic killing fields. they have created value less God less children.
  • R Load more replies

  • #17
    !
    Ah yes, The Youngs Turks...on Al Gore Jazeera TV! You people call Rush a second rate hack. What the hell are The Young Turks then? LOL
  • #183
    !
    @MongoAPillager Rush understans the azzholes of the world and has diligently aspired to Hemorrhoid status and has definitely become a distinctive itch $$$$$$$
  • Comment removed for Engagement Etiquette violation. Replies may also be deleted.
  • #30
    !
    @Cheenoguy Take your own advice. Obviously the fact that you're using profanity in response already ruins your credibility here. I have read books, you should perhaps do the same. BTW, I got a 4.0 in History.
  • Comment removed for Engagement Etiquette violation. Replies may also be deleted.
  • #53
    !
    Actually, Hitler liberalized Germany's gun laws when he took power. The Weimar Republic banned firearms altogether. Hitler first stripped citizenship from "undesirables" and then passed laws that allowed private citizens to own anything but handguns. This created a citizenry with military grade weapons that, unfortunately, did little or nothing to impede Allied forces from taking Berlin.
  • Comment removed for Engagement Etiquette violation. Replies may also be deleted.
  • R Load more replies

  • #26
    !
    What is it the Liberals always say 11 of theirs calls a Republican congresswoman by the "c" word?

    .... oh yeah it was only satire :-o
  • #25
    !
    Even though I don't listen to Limbaugh, he isn't the only one who's saying this. Lots of people feel that he's just using the children's presence on his stage as fodder for his hate campaign.
    As to the one who said fetuses aren't yet children, WHAT!! Your ignorance is showing in a glaring way.
  • #101
    !
    It's a good thing you only insulted me and didn't use naughty words or you would be getting warnings from topix.

    Fetuses aren't children. They are potential children. If it can't live on its own it isn't life yet.

    I'm not upset that he is critical of children being in the stage. I think it's a stupid thing to be upset about, but I don't care. I find it offensive that he mocked children who are scared that they might be the next victim of a psychotic school shooter.
  • #4
    !
    Why would anyone care what this third rate entertainer thinks? He's deeply out of touch with reality, and does nothing but pander to his base for profit. The funny part is, his base is too dim to figure out that they are being used.
  • #2
    !
    Why "liberal" outrage? I can understand Limbaugh fans are so down deep in the gutter they wouldn't know decency if it walked right over them but I would think there should be many decent, honest conservatives that don't like this drug-abusing clown "representing" the Republicans, at all.
  • #174
    !
    Limbaugh is like Norquist, many reasonable Republicans are afraid of him.
    Crazy Republicans worship him.

    In the end, he will have done nothing but prolong the agony.
  • #55
    !
    Liberals slam Limbaugh for getting out of bed in the morning. He is right on about the president's hypocrisy for exploiting kids, while saying his kids are off limits. Low information liberals will never figure it out!
    Funny, they didn't care when George Bush's daughters were mocked .
  • #111
    !
    The bit about hypocrisy, I'll grant you that one. I hate it when any politician uses "the children" to further a political agenda. However, I don't recall any mocking of GW Bush's daughters while they were still underage. I'm pretty sure they were adults by the time anyone paid any attention to their activities.
  • #122
    !
    @Denizen_Kate At what age do your children cease to be your children?
    The Bush twins were 19 when they moved into the White House and from day one they were fodder for the liberal media.
  • #133
    !
    @puppybrownie - Over 18 makes them adults, that's all I was saying. I'm not saying it was fair to focus media attention on them, just saying they weren't children.
  • #48
    !
    Keep up the good work Rushbo! I'm thinking we should use kids for political purposes too. Like prolife issues or we can have them pleading for the left not to leave them in perpetual debt. After all, the new hope is no hope. ;)
  • #85
    !
    Rus brought up just that angle today. What if a republican President surrounded themself with abortion survivors while introducing a list of executive orders meant to weaken Roe v Wade?
  • #89
    !
    @Bobolinsky I know, so did Fox yesturday. It's all liberal hypocricy! Personally I don't believe in over turning Roe V Wade, but I put it out there for the sarcastic effect.:)
  • #43
    !
    Obama used those kids as props in a propaganda stunt. He isn't the first politician to do so and unfortunately he won't be the last. Kids don't write letters to the president unless they are directed to do so by an adult *with a motive*. But let's all pile on Rush rather than take the president to task for using kids to announce utterly useless actions that won't fix anything.
  • #35
    !
    Obama is filthy and repugnant.(Repugnant must be the word of the month). Anyway I find that Obama using the "chosen" children disgusting and reminds me of many evil dictators that do the same thing. Where were my kids, my neighbors and friends kids? They wrote letters to Obama asking him to please not politicize the sandy hook tragedy. To not use it for his agenda or to boost his self importance and need to be king. To wrongfully go after the guns. To wrongly put blame on anyone (especially law abiding citizens) except where it belongs on the perp.
    But really I, my neighbors or my friends wouldn't allow their children to be up there or used for political fodder anyway. Obviously Obama and liberals have no problem exploiting children though. It is "repugnant" they and Obama are filthy disgusting people.
  • #8
    !
    limbaugh is one sick individual, the man has nothing hate in his heart and needs mental help, seriously.
  • #1
    !
    After Fluke Rush is now seeking to reduce his advertising base even more. He's a true Tea Party follower. I will shoot myself in the foot at every opportunity is my oath
  • #36
    !
    Why give this Nazi gasbag any attention at all? He's nothing but a racist hatemonger and anyone who listens to him is too. I'm tired of hearing "you don't listen to him so you don't understand Rush", or "Rush is an entertainer". Anyone who makes his living peddling hate like Limbaugh does is the lowest form of life. If the moderators see fit to remove this post so be it. Rush and his audience are scum.
  • #51
    !
    @PNWest No more "scum" than a racist hatemonger liberal president that uses children as a human shield to push his gun-grabbing agenda.
  • Comment removed for Engagement Etiquette violation. Replies may also be deleted.
  • Comment removed for Engagement Etiquette violation. Replies may also be deleted.
  • Comment removed for Engagement Etiquette violation. Replies may also be deleted.
  • R Load more replies

  • #109
    !
    I am not sure why anyone gets any more or less upset with Limbaugh than Family Guy, South Park, Howard Stern or any other show on radio or TV. All of these people\programs have a shock value that either entertains those who don't take things personal and see the humor or highly offends various segments of population that are highly emotional and the easily offended. By doing so they all have enjoyed huge audiences and long term sustained revenue. Limbaugh has an audience somewhere around 14.5 million and despite the efforts to send Limbaugh off to join Stern on pay radio via efforts to silence him with sponsor boycotts Limbaugh is still able to choose his sponsor rather than they choose him. Love him or hate him the man has a strategy that works. The easily offended should be rallying to the cause from this post in 3.....2.......1
  • R Load more comments...
Post