On Tuesday, a writer for the Washington Post mistakenly reported that Sarah Palin was hired as a host for the upcoming Al Jazeera America channel. The article, which has since been corrected, cited claims from The Daily Currant that Palin had been tapped for a key role in the new network. Writer Suzi Parker did not notice, however, that The Daily Currant is a satirical site.Making matters worse, the WP continued to tweet the bogus claim even after the story had been corrected. The public had a field day with the flub, with one Twitter user declaring that "Sarah Palin joining Al Jazeera as a host would be a riot!" and another offering this unlikely hypothetical: "Sarah Palin brokers peace deal between #Israel and #Cambodia." Jim Treacher at the Daily Caller gives it all the requisite partisan interpretation: "I can see why a WaPo reporter would be fooled," he writes. "The story is ridiculous and assumes the worst about a conservative; 'Ha ha, she said Al-JaJizzraa!'" But why a liberal reporter would find it easy to believe a conservative had gone to work for Al Jazeera, when the former is typically no fan of the latter, well, that's kind of odd. Via Al Jazeera, the Daily Caller and the Medill School of Journalism.
Image: Talking Points Memo
Want more stories like this?
Try our Daily Email for a regular dose of the issues you care about!