Best
71 Comments
Post
  • #3
    !
    Of course it matters. What kind of lowlife likes violent videos of people being assaulted. This man doesn't belong in public office. And he has really bad taste in butts I might add.
  • #4
    !
    "What kind of lowlife likes violent videos of people being assaulted."
    Apparently most of America since shows like "America's Funniest Home Video's" are so popular. Cmon, don't pretend that America doesn't have a fascination with people getting in accidents. Look at some of the most viewed video's on YouTube.
    I think most Americans are judgmental a55hats that hold politicians to standards they themselves don't hold to.
  • #6
    !
    @Fishbone345 - BIG difference between AFV cute puppies and skateboarders falling on their butts and the violent fight videos and porn videos that this ahole is peeping. How you spend your spare time tells a lot about a person.
  • #9
    !
    @AntiBullshit No, it doesn't. How he performs on the job is all we should be concerning ourselves with. What he does in his own time is only his business. I wouldn't want to be judged and no one else should be either.
    And for your info, AFV didn't stick with cute puppies, as the show went on, the most popular videos were of kids hitting dad with a baseball or something similar. There are several shows on History and TLC that are nothing but video of horrendous accidents. So, American DOES have a fascination with violence and this man is no worse than they are.
  • #13
    !
    @Fishbone345 Ok let me rephrase. What kind of low life like videos of being being violently assualted?". I see a difference in laughing at some moron who does a stunt and it goes bad in that he did it to himself without anyone forcing him to do so. Fans of Violent assaults as is shown all over the internet by thugs and punks are not the kind of people I want in public office. Including this guy.
  • #14
    !
    @Fishbone345 - I disagree. While the fair on AFV is screened, the violent videos on the "knock you out" and the porn on "big booties" is freely distributed as over the top, unedited violence and porn. IF you were to find that Bush or Reagan had a little fetish to look at such things, would you give them a pass? At what level to we give our current public officials a pass? How about if his "big booties" website shows underage children? Is that then OK for him to be a fan? Or how about the "knock you out" site? What if he likes to see stabbings? Is that different? Or snuff films? Are those not fascinating violence? Where do you cross the line?

    IMO: Public officials have no business and no right to view, participate in or attend live shows of violence and demeaning sexual activities. Leave that to the private perverts hiding in the shadows.
  • R Load more replies

  • #5
    !
    Criticizing a politician's Facebook behavior is just silly. Everybody knows the serious stuff goes out on Twitter. ;)
  • #7
    !
    Unfortunately for political figures, they are put at a much higher level of accountability and decency...don't like it...leave the political scene and become a regular citizen...
  • #67
    !
    As a detective, would he have had a reason to research the violent pics? Don't know, and don't care. His stance on gun control is far more meaningful, and can't be explained by a possible errant click
  • #64
    !
    He can do this because first he's black second probably a democrat so they can do these things and nothing will happen to them. And bet you if this story ever hit the major news channels it would soon become a racial issue.
  • #51
    !
    Nothing wrong with the man liking what he likes on his own time. I'm a BUTT MAN myself. "I like a big butt and I can't deny...." lol
  • #25
    !
    The story didn't mention his age. So, is he mid/late 20's early 30's... with the mind of a 15-year old? This fool sounds like the East Coast version of former Detroit mayor, Kwame Kilpatrick.
  • R Load more comments...
Post