Best
158 Comments
Post
  • #5
    !
    NO MORE RESTRICTIONS on Americans! No Universal Background Checks (Political talk for gun registration, then confiscation), No so-called "assault" weapon ban (they're now called homeland security weapons, or freedom sticks), no high-cap ban (they're regular capacity, not high). No more restrictions on the Bill of Rights. Americans are getting tired of this disarmament propaganda from these extremist politicians.
  • #7
    !
    It's odd that a terrible crime happens, and they attack the most law abiding demographic in the nation.
  • #19
    !
    I will tell you exactly why she and those like her want to take the guns away and that is because the lack of morality welfare state that they have created is causing problems and they have no answers has to how to controll their own doings.
  • R Load more replies

  • #8
    !
    For every civilian that gets to testify for the ban there should be a civilian available to testify against this. These pricks do not live in the real world and have heavily armed security, therefor it is a blatant act of stupidity for them to not pay attention to the polls as well as the people who voted them into office. I hope these dumba** democrats do vote for it so they can lose their seats next term because they are ignoring the legal, lawabiding citizens! And when they do get voted out I hope they lose their damn armed security and get a taste of being a victim of crime!
  • #11
    !
    Finding the hundreds of weapons still outstanding from the ATF sale to Mexican drug cartels would be a much wiser pursuit, and more productive, but then again, that wouldn't serve their purposes.
  • #39
    !
    It is trully sad that this is the caliber of goverment that we have to settle for.Incompetence does not begin to describe the inability of these people.
  • #4
    !
    Do you support the assault weapons ban?

    Absolutely NOT!!

    assault weapons have been banned since 1984, and even to own an M16 today you already are required to have a class 3 FFL.

    all these democrats want to do is to litterally steal your American freedoms
  • #75
    !
    @marine1 That's not true; it's a lie that's been debunked over and over but hey, why not keep repeating it since it fits your agenda?
  • #84
    !
    @marine1 I'm not kidding. I heard the accusation in more detail before and looked it up. The person passing around the "information" was wrong and/or lying about well over half the people on the list. Heck, kids too young to vote, like the Columbine killers, were somehow counted as "Democrats." People who live in states which do not allow partisanship registration were counted as "Democrats." It was just internet bs.
    The fact is that people who are mass murderers and/or random assassins are sociopaths or some other flavor of screw-loose crazy. They aren't leftists. They aren't rightwingers. They are nuts.
  • #97
    !
    @Zazziness I think you look at my post enough to know i like to stir the pot every once in a while. You are right, the people that shoot up the joint are nuts but then those that are suppose to competently legislate a resolve to the situation are just as nuts. Reality is, what they purpose will NOT solve the problem.
  • R Load more replies

  • #10
    !
    An AR-15 has the same fire rate as a double action revolver. In fact, with enough training, one can reload a revolver in less than a second's time. I don't know who would want to carry around a pocket full of speed loaders, but my point still remains. One shot per trigger pull. The bans are ONLY about cosmetics. Those EVIL EVIL black guns.
  • #14
    !
    She wants to ban ALL handguns also. "Mr and Mrs. America, turn them all in" is her quote when asked if she could ban all firearms, would she.
  • #17
    !
    You can see from the debates on here that a lot of people who support the ban don't even know what an "assault weapon" is. It's laughable that they call the AR a "military" gun!
  • #20
    !
    Always wondered if all this "hoopla" would be happening if assault weapons were painted rich hue colors......something for the gun manf. to think about?
  • #22
    !
    @AnnieO Exactly, and that is what Obama and her are counting on, swaying the non-gun owners or the uninformed owners into going along with their bans. That is why educating people on firearms in a positive way is the best defense and offense in preserving American's rights.
  • #27
    !
    @stepped_in_it I saw a pink camo AR-15. It was cute but only had a .22 caliber. I like my black ones in .556.
  • R Load more replies

  • #3
    !
    The people supporting these bans are the most ignorant to the topic. Just ask Carolyn McCarthy about the "shoulder thing that goes up". I know I am thinking the impossible, but I hope that there are enough people in Congress with enough sense to see that any bans will reduce crime. I originally was for the background checks, but after doing my own research, I have to oppose it as well on the basis that my information will be in a central database. I am all for FFL checks where my records will be kept on file with a dealer and can be seen with a warrant, but no, I don't want any government agency to have free reign on what firearms I have purchased without probable cause.
  • #15
    !
    This much ado about nothing. Pandering for votes in 2014. Working the bases. Smoke screening the fiscal situation. What's it not is legislation. And restrictions on guns will come from individual states. Not the feds. Won't happen.
  • #35
    !
    Yeah, but nothing is more fun than dropping a stink bomb in a room and locking the door behind ya. Just have to wonder how many will scream either "civil war", bear arms, cold dead hands and or 2nd amendment without realizing what exactly this is......pandering!
  • #13
    !
    "Feinstein, the author of the first ban"......You Californians have allow this woman to be in politics since (at least) 1994? Think it's time to take away you guy's granola/berries and medical MJ because you have all lost touch with reality. Her and Boxer convinces me Cali needs to shake into the ocean and give someone else a chance for ocean views....LOL
  • #23
    !
    @Concerned_Cit IDK.....I grew up there and......yeah, they're that crazy. Californians are very much like granola....what isn't fruits, nuts is flakes.....;-)
  • #126
    !
    I'm doing my best to talk some sense into them. But, most are simply not receptive to logic, reason, facts, the rule-of-law, or rational thought. They prefer to just "feel" their way through life - thinking (about anything) is just waaay too much effort.

    The Democrats here now have a super-majority in both houses - as well as controlling the governor's mansion and the courts. They have already banned any carry of any gun (even unloaded) by 99% of the citizens (i.e. those not politically connected). Now their are gearing up for full registration followed by confiscation. Brace for impact.
  • #136
    !
    A leaked US Department of Justice 9 page Memorandum, by Deputy Director Greg Ridgeway, dated January 4, 2013, actually ADMITS that 1) "Assault Weapons" (sic) are RARELY used in crimes/homicides 2) even with COMPLETE ELIMINATION of "assault weapons" (sic) would not be an impact on homicides. So WHO is the Administration REALLY trying to disarm here? It's this kind of total dishonesty, hypocrisy, and weasely behavior that has turned many of us off this Administration.
  • #123
    !
    In fairness, remember she is only a diabolical Calif version of a Democrat. They have used the power of their majority to tear the State to shreds.
  • #77
    !
    it has been proven that these bans do nothing to prevent mass murder, all anyone will to check and see. this is just another feeble attempt at taking rights.

    darn shame anyone would fall for this nonsense the gov is pushing.
  • #72
    !
    Why don't these people that wanna ban "assault weapons" move to countries that do have them banned and see how they like it. So sick of people trying to take away our freedoms. Don't like out constitution then hit the road jack because no one is keeping ya here.
  • #79
    !
    I think maybe they should ove into the communities that most often abuse them so they can get a better understand as to the mind set of the abusers.
  • #67
    !
    The only senators that will support this are the ones who are going to retire shortly and the ones who are going to be retired abruptly for supporting it
  • #47
    !
    That stupid ban does nothing to prevent mass shootings…example: columbine; she just doesn’t want Americans pointing their guns at the real criminals…this thing is waiting for her payday…that’s when her handlers “banksters” crash the economy and America looks more like the movie “Soylent Green”
  • #51
    !
    "Soylent ..........greeeen......is..... .....Peeeeeople!" LMAO I miss Charlton Heston, he was a true man among men and stood for freedom.
  • #45
    !
    punish the law abiding citizen for political resume. This law has no value, scareface will still have automatic weapons and gang bangers will still have 15 round clips.
  • #26
    !
    Sen. Dianne Feinstein is indeed an actual welfare state communism seeker, No wonder the state of CA, is so messed up with the likes of people like her.
  • #53
    !
    That is because she and those like her have NO idea how to make an honest dollar. They only know how to take from those that do.
  • #21
    !
    "shall not be infringed" is not understood by the illiterate gun grabbers who either can't read the Constitution or choose to ignore it. Our county sheriff calls malls, schools, theaters, Chicago, and New York shooting galleries with live moving targets!
  • R Load more comments...
Post