Best
148 Comments
Post
  • #1
    !
    Why is this blowhard still here? Wasn't he going to leave America if healthcare passed or Obama won or some other faux outrage? Why can't he just keep his word and get out?
  • #8
    !
    I know you don't like him, but if it takes someone of the likes of Limbaugh to point out the WH's actions, which our President "didn't know about"...I would say that he can stay. I didn't know about this and I am quite disappointed in our President, which happens often. Not necessarily that this would happen, because that's no surprise, but that he has no gall to take blame for anything.
  • #24
    !
    @PNWest-- Did you listen to it? Rush isn;t going anywhere except to Costa Rica for quality healthcare when it's no longer available in the US... sort of like how Canadians come to the US for their medical care now. It's already starting in CA.

    Doctor Shortage Likely to Worsen With Health Law
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/29/health/poli...

    California Redefines 'Doctors' to Compensate for Obamacare Shortages - See more at: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...

    You do know that Costa Rica is a healthcare tourism destination don't you? You do know that we're headed towards the waits and denials of care that Canadians experience that prompts them to go south of the border for care?
  • #30
    !
    Yes, lets ignore the real action that occured and concentrate on Rush so we don't have to admit that crooked things are happening. If it was one of the talking heads from MSLSD bringing this up, you would be falling over yourself to jump aboard.
  • R Load more replies

  • #4
    !
    Obama didn't know about the release of illegal immigrants? If you'll buy that I have some ocean-front property in Arizona for sale.
  • #121
    !
    The Obama administration it by far the most fraudulently manipulative administration to ever step food anywhere near the whit house. This administration has lied to or miss lead this country from day one.
  • #123
    !
    @marine1 weapons of mass destruction ring a bell? show me that Obama released these guys and not a pencil pusher at the ICE with an axe to grind tryinjg to make a point about the budget cuts. You think he's the only person capabale of grandstanding?
  • #124
    !
    @frigginhell I think he is suppose to be the responsible person in charge but on that issue i could be mistaken, you deside.
  • #132
    !
    @marine1 So he micromanages every cabinet of every federal office of every state of every department. Hell, I'd probalby hire someone to do that. Oh wait, they do. I'm not saying that he is not in charge. I'm saying he doesn't make every ground level decision for every government job and agency in the country. If he does nothing about it, then yes it's his fault. If someone did it because he isn't writing the budget for the ICE (then again he only signs the budgets but we'll pretend it's his fault the house forgot how to do their job since that seems to be popular these days) but he fails to do anything about it, then it's his fault that he did nothing. There is a chain of command for these things. Then again, their budget is at their discretion because again that's not his job. If congress can't pass a budget then this agency and a lot of other agencies will do things people don't like because that's what sequestration is all about. Cutting costs without having the fortitude to stand by what programs you want to cut because you're a gutless house representative who says we need cuts but don't have the balls to put it in writing where you want to make them because it might cost you a vote.
  • R Load more replies

  • #101
    !
    One feature of the Democratic victory last fall that hasn't gotten much attention is their media usage. While the GOP stuck to its tried-and-true broadcast media format, including Limbaugh, the younger, more diverse and ultimately more numerous Democratic voters were cultivated and organized by new media, like smartphone apps, Facebook, Twitter, G+ and Reddit.

    As the inevitable demographic erosion of the Republican base continues, guys like Limbaugh will also erode. I don't think Rush will outlive his audience.
  • #14
    !
    Obama has commited more than one impeachable offense. Of course he was behind this, he is denying it now because Rush called him on it. Very simple.
  • #67
    !
    I liked the way you began with libel without any backup then made a mighty leap to an unsubstantiated conclusion that fits your pre-decided agenda. It really is very simple when you avoid all facts, I guess.
  • #114
    !
    @Zazziness Anyone who knows the Constitution knows what he has done to violate it. Those would be the facts. It's quite simple when you are well informed.
  • #2
    !
    Team Obama? LOL!
    Anyway, the guy has a point and the WH knows everything that goes on with the constituents in which they pander towards...They just deny it and pass on the buck, ie poor Hillary Clinton.
  • #131
    !
    How stupid are the American people? Nobody with three brain cells would believe Obama didnt know. Since when are 500 criminals release without a legal process???.its BULLSHIT!! He knew!! And most are probable kin!! LoL
  • #21
    !
    Go ahead impeach him. (Impeachment is the trial not the act taking down from office). The senate decides his impeachment trials anyway and I highly doubt that a Democratic majority Senate would take a Democratic president down from office.
  • #63
    !
    You have that backwards. The house decides on impeachment and then sends the articles of impleachment to the senate where they hold the trial to remove the president form office.
  • #70
    !
    "The impeachment process is a two-step procedure. The House of Representatives must first pass, by a simple majority of those present and voting, articles of impeachment, which constitute the formal allegation or allegations. Upon their passage, the defendant has been "impeached". Next, the Senate tries the accused. In the case of the impeachment of a president, the Chief Justice of the United States presides over the proceedings. For the impeachment of any other official, the Constitution is silent on who shall preside, suggesting that this role falls to the Senate's usual presiding officer. This may include the impeachment of the vice president, although legal theories suggest that allowing a defendant to be the judge in his own case would be a blatant conflict of interest. If the Vice President did not preside over an impeachment (of anyone besides the President), the duties would fall to the President pro tempore of the Senate."

    An example would be Bill Clinton was impeached by the house, but was aquited by the Senate in his trial to be removed from office.
  • #18
    !
    No President can possibly know everything the bureaucracy does before the fact and there are many many many thousands of bureaucrats that think they are a law unto themselves (for the most part they are). I won't fault Obama for this up to this point. Now let's see what he does about it. They are, after all illegal.
  • #95
    !
    @jessejaymes That order came from the WH. The damage is done, and the president isn't going to do nothing about it except cite the sequester and point the finger at republicans for it.
  • #100
    !
    @jessejaymes Manufactured and exploited crisis! Come on man, I thought you prided yourself on not falling for either sides bull! Let me know when and if Obama fires anyone over this!
  • #103
    !
    @AlexMIA Whatever Alex. Govt doesn't react like that. Not under Reagan, not under anyone. They have a firestorm and that's govt does. Deals with firestorms in a manner in which they think they can make the most political capital and/or minimize the damage. BOTH parties.
  • R Load more replies

  • #27
    !
    @Bobolinsky Well, for starters...most things out of his mouth are either lies, distortions, or both. He routinely "talks down" to the very audience who lap up each and every word that he utters. He pretty much admits that he "failed at pretty much everything in his life"...His declarations, not mine. He should really just stick to something that he knows best...(how to set up his house-keeper to take the fall for illegally buying drugs) for HIM!
  • R Load more replies

  • #147
    !
    I have mixed feeling there, but I do know he fails at uphold the laws of our country, he fails to uphold the constitution. and he should be impeached just for that.
  • #146
    !
    Why release them back on the streets or towns. Only thing they had too do give them a free one way ticket back to where they came from.
  • #144
    !
    The right to PARDON.
    Obama can release anyone he wants.
    Why are most people voting "yes"? Whether you think the law should be changed so this becomes an impeachable offense or not is irrelevant. Ought is not is. Ought and is is a very important distinction. If you habitually mix them up please repeat over and over again in your head "Ought is NOT is and Is is NOT ought!"
  • #142
    !
    There are so many illegal offenses under the current administration that it's absolutely ridiculous that Obama hasn't been impeached yet! Nobody else could have gotten away with as much, regardless of their political affiliation.
  • #140
    !
    Lets look at this. There is always a legal way for a politician do do what ever its wants. So impeachable, no. Typical of lack of respect for America, yes.
  • R Load more comments...
Post