Best
53 Comments
Post
  • #1
    !
    You got one person of poor character allegedly making up stories about another person of poor character so picking a side here is pointless anyhow.
  • #5
    !
    I agree Jimmy. Like my Grandma used to say "lay with trash, you become trash." Sounds to me he bought a testimony, but really who do you believe?
  • #21
    !
    @MadAmerican - I find that in most legal matters where there are two highly conflicting stories...the truth is usually hidden somewhere in the middle. All this sounds fishy to me.
  • R Load more replies

  • #9
    !
    Hey Politix. How about an "I don't care." option.
    This whole thing is stoooopid. He's a liar and should be thrown out of office.
  • #27
    !
    Wherever there is smoke there is usually a fire!! Menendez and his thug buddies have paid her off to change her story.
  • #6
    !
    "Menendez has been accused of accepting improper gifts from a friend, in the form of a private plane flight to the D.R. He did not report the trips, but reimbursed his donor $58,500 on Jan. 4 of 2013. Senate ethics rules require gifts to be either reported or paid for by the recipient."

    So, does the Freedom of Information Act allow voters to see ALL of the gifts that members of Congress receive?

    "We'd like to get disclosure of who lobbyists are meeting with and what they're talking about," says Lisa Rosenberg of the nonprofit Sunlight Foundation. "Right now the public doesn't have any idea of who's talking to whom and what they're asking for. We think that would certainly be a step in the right direction."
  • #2
    !
    And its judt a coincidence that the sex party with the underage girls and the senator took place in the EXACT same villa that the clintons stayed at when the infamous "dancing on the beach" photo was "leaked" during the lewinsky bj scandal. the owner is a top shelf dem donor who also set menendez up for his pedophilia parties.
  • #10
    !
    BSKing your name is so appropriate, after all what would a top democratic party supporter want more than to discredit the democratic party. Sheesh!
  • #22
    !
    @bsking might not be the same girls who are trying to clear him,those girls could very well be gone.
  • #24
    !
    @tomincali I'll bet the ones who are giving testimony now are Martians. And I'll bet Martians hate truth, justice and The American Way. I'm surprised they haven't made the streets run purple with blood of slaughter Venusians.
    Seriously, you guys. Do you run on anything except wild, unfounded, malicious speculation?
  • #25
    !
    @Zazziness nope it is just i see when those in office are caught lies start flying. cover ups and what not. next it will be what difference does it make.
  • R Load more replies

  • #31
    !
    Only an IDIOT believes the word of an escort or politician. They are both whores for money, so suddenly she's telling the truth????????? HAHHAHAHA Get real!!!!!!!!
  • #20
    !
    I just read the Miami papers, and it sounds like WaPo interviewed a different prostitute than the Daily Caller interviewed. I find it hard to believe that there is a prostitute in the DR that Menendez did *not* see, but it is a big country...
  • #30
    !
    Very confusing reporting. For example, WaPo is talking about a 23yo prostitute and DC is talking about two underage prostitutes. Lots of lawyers accusing each other, the FBI leaking good and/or bad stuff...

    Smells like a coverup, but covering up what types of crimes?
  • #16
    !
    I really don't know what to believe. It does look like she was paid off to recant. I really don't want this story to be true. I may be a conservative, but I am part Hispanic too. I want more Hispanics in congress and this scandle could take one out.
  • #15
    !
    sounds like the girls got the money owed and then some extra for court. should have paid them in the first place and he would not have had this problem. the girls are like our politicians pay them off and get your way.
  • #14
    !
    I strongly suspect this woman has been paid to recant, if she was even part of the original accusation. As the article notes, her name is different. Would the Washington Post aid in a coverup for a prominent Democrat? In a heartbeat.
  • #38
    !
    Such a narrow view you have of things. It's possible that everyone is lying and that their is no truth to be found in any corner of this story.
  • #48
    !
    I think her story changed due to some coaxing...but honestly, who cares...they guy wanted to have some fun...it is his life and he will have to eventually suffer through the consequences of his decision...
  • #32
    !
    See...That's why I ALWAYS wait until the "other shoe drops" before I comment on stories like this one....Because they almost always originate from someone on the right...and never include any tangible evidence...And----well the truth usually comes out some time later---Once the damage has already been done...Never trust a Republican!
  • #19
    !
    This is just another example of the moral bankruptcy of the right. Rather than calling for an investigation of who was trying to frame a sitting United States Senator the righties persist in believing the proven false allegations. To the republicans it is always party over country. Whoever attempted to frame the congressman should be charged.
  • #33
    !
    Yeah. You are right. Go Get em ! Now better go after Hank Johnson (D) who blamed fast & Furious on the NRA and the Tea Party. Better get busy, boy.
  • R Load more comments...
Post